this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Cool Guides

93 readers
1 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Food and agriculture have a significant impact on our planet, particularly in terms of carbon emissions, water withdrawals, and land use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It excludes the fact that animal-based farming contributes greatly to water pollution, too.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The source paper does a lot of napkin math without context apparently.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you read the original study?

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you? I’m going by what I heard people say about it.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, many times. I've linked it in this thread.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Methane with cow-based agriculture too

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original study does show water pollution, even going so far as to split it between acidification and eutrophication.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good find. Yes, the original study accounts for water pollution, but this chart (conveniently) excludes it.

When you include the water pollution, the impact to the environment are FAR, FAR worse than this chart suggests.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's really an "exclusion" to show the relative carbon impacts. A more comprehensive infographic could certainly be made, but there's nothing wrong with a simple one that focuses on a specific topic.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I guess that depends on the definition of “environmental impact”, but you're right about nothing wrong with focusing on a specific topic. 👌

load more comments (1 replies)