this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
528 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
5 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
528
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a memeber of said Militia can spend 2 weeks in a psychiatric ward for hearing voices in his head telling him to shoot up the said Militia he is a part of and still keep the means to carry out the will of said voices it isn't well-regulated, sorry not sorry. The term Well-Regulated doesnt automatically mean it is going to be regulated.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Here's the thing though:

can spend 2 weeks in a psychiatric ward for hearing voices in his head telling him to shoot up the said Militia

They can't, it is already a federal law that people who are IVC'd (this guy) are prohibited purchasers and they are supposed to take the guns and input that into NICs, but someone didn't do their fucking job. Has nothing to do with the weekend warrior ~~militia~~ branch of the US military either, that applies to everyone, federally, as it is a federal law.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Between active and reservists there are well over one million national guard memebers. The crimes of one of them hardly imply that the regulation is not good. Mistakes are possible, and considering he was let out of the psych hospital is it impossible to think the mistake even could have come from the profit driven org who makes the absolute thinniest proft margins from mental health care? What about the police, did they not also drop the ball, they could have seen this coming, this person was known publicly for his gun lust and extremism. Or is all the blame only on the one orginazation that makes your opinions the most correct looking?

[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mistakes are possible

Yeah, mistakes like american gun laws. In related news, this year, a soldier from Germany's National Guard did not go on a killing spree. Nor did a soldier of the French National Guard.

IT IS THE GODDAMN FUCKING GUNS

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A French cop went on a mass shooting in 2017. In 2020 an ex soldier in france went on a shooting. Sure it wasn't this year but acting like this doesn't happen elsewhere is wild. In fact the chances that the shooter is in a well regulated legal organization are higher elsewhere since the other people dont even have guns like that. So I assume Frances gun laws are a problem for you too since they cant stop their Law Enforcement from doing this?

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is plenty of blame to go around, the problem is systemic. Putting the blame on one institution makes it a scapegoat, we need publicly funded mental health care as much as we need gun control.

[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

we need publicly funded mental health care as much as we need gun control.

While the US definitely needs publicly funded (mental) health care, it will not address the gun issue. It doesn't matter if a country has public health care or not, what matters for gun related deaths is either a) number of (civil) guns or b) (civil) war.

Do not give into gun nuts in this regard. Do not agree that the US needs both. The US needs exactly and only one thing when it comes to gun deaths: Fewer guns.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah fam, we need both. Fewer guns, even destorying every AR15 in America wouldn't solve the #1 cause of gun deaths in America, which is suicide.

[–] thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Removing guns (or at least access to them) can actually reduce the rate of suicide. Guns are quick and easy to use to commit suicide, whereas many other methods take time to set up and don't work as often. When someone is feeling suicidal, often having that little bit of extra time can let the feeling decrease enough to prevent an attempt.

Of course, removing access to guns doesn't fix why people feel suicidal in the first place. That is a whole nother can of worms. But I expect everyone agrees that reducing the number of suicides is good.

RAND: How Gun Policies Affect Suicide

The consensus among public health experts is that there is strong evidence that reducing firearm suicides in contexts where more-lethal means of attempting suicide are unavailable will result in reductions in the total suicide rate (see, for example, Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention, 2012; World Health Organization, 2014; for review, see Azrael and Miller, 2016).

Save.org: Restricting access to lethal means:

Research has shown time and again that restricting access to lethal means or “means restriction” can saves lives. By restricting access to firearms and other highly lethal methods the decline in suicide rates by that method and overall suicide rates begin to decline. Restricting access to lethal means does not always lead to fewer deaths, but is one suicide prevention measure that merits further research and more individual-level intervention training to make lethal means less readily available.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Japan would like a word (but they're too busy killing themselves without guns.)

Guns may be more effective but I'd argue OTC meds are "easier" considering you don't get NICs checked for tylenol. And frankly many suicidal people (not all ofc) already have a problem with a particular drug that causes 96,000+ accidental deaths/yr, shooting of another nature, which kills 36,000 more people than guns/yr including suicide, that could also be used quite easily and peacefully as opposed to doing your best impression of Dead from Meyhem.

Simply banning guns wouldn't help, we still need to address the root causes. And once we address the root causes gun control will be a whole lot less necessary anyway. At the very least, we should start with the things that will be actually helpful and then move to the pointless bans which worked so well for those drugs 96,000 people OD on each year.

[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, definitely. But never admit that when talking to gun nuts.