this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Science

374 readers
1 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The whole channel should have way more views. Science fraud is a topic that scientists knows and talk about but it is always vague and it's hard to point at precises cases due to lack of documentation (and journalists in general).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halfempty@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would not consider reactionary youtube videos to be a reasonable place for the consideration of the validity of a scientific claim. So many are just propaganda and misinformation. Note: The youtube account is using the video to push a questionable investment scheme.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you, I was about to post the same thing.

Youtube videos like this is the modern equivalent of getting medical advice from a random person in a bar you have never met before about 20 minutes before closing time.

Yes, there is a replication problem in science but youtube is not the place to get information about it.

[–] Kajika@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes the ads is quiet bad. I didn't know this was a reactionary youtube channel. Do you have any information of the video content being false?