The authenticity of the sources seems plausible.
It's not about me or what I find convincing, and it 's not my intention to convince anyone, so pls don't judge others by yourself

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Finished my edit a second after you posted this.

I would argue that a story "seeming plausible" isn't a particularly good reason for these extreme accusations, but you do you.

[–] Kulun@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't try to twist the words in my mouth. I never said the story is plausible, but the authenticity of the sources
can you tell the difference?

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What? No, I can't particularly see how you could consider the story implausible while the sources are authentic. (EDIT: Unless you believe that the BBC is deliberately drawing faulty conclusions.)

[–] Kulun@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I respect that you can't see it, so have a nice day anyway.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago

You have a nice day, too.