this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
49 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obsidian looks interesting, but I'm already using emacs and I'm pretty sure every feature in obsidian can be done in emacs.

Honestly emacs is pretty decent for almost every text related task and many non text related tasks as well.

[–] tuckerm@supermeter.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...I’m pretty sure every feature in obsidian can be done in emacs.

It definitely can. Unfortunately, I was the only emacs user on my team at work, so switching from org-mode to something that used plain markdown files was beneficial. There's a network effect here -- sharing notes is valuable.

Also, since Obsidian (and Logseq, which is what I use now) both use save plain markdown files, you can still edit your notes in emacs.

Honestly emacs is pretty decent for almost every text related task and many non text related tasks as well.

For sure, emacs is still my favorite operating system. :)

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For sure, emacs is still my favorite operating system. :)

(Neo)Vim guy here. That's something that I love and hate about emacs. It's powerful and extensible to the point of being intimidating (being basically a lisp interpreter that can write lisp is crazy, in a good way). If I didn't do work on remote machines, I'd probably give it another go, as I enjoyed it the when I used it before. Just not enough time these days, with all of the other stuff that I want to do.

[–] alexs@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally only use emacs for it's org-mode. However, the few times I needed to remote edit files TrampMode has been on point.

Just letting you all know this exists.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

That's pretty awesome.

[–] abhibeckert 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly emacs is pretty decent for almost every text related task

With emphasis on "pretty decent". Personally my bar is higher than that...

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, there's a wide range of text related tasks. Some of those tasks, I would say emacs is very good at (like programming or taking notes), and others are good enough (like email and file management). The reason that I would want to use it for the worse tasks is that the text editing tools between the tasks are all the same and its all programmable.

Its all personal preference though.