Asklemmy

1452 readers

42 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Does Bing Chat give reliable answers to math and physics questions? If not is it possible to make it more reliable? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by Wrong_thought_7@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I realize and understand the criticisms of ChatGPT and I have personally seem how bad it can be. Once I asked to count the number of days till a random date giving the present date and it failed miserably, again and again. Trust me! I get the criticism. But, what about Bing Chat Bot?

Have you ever tried to ask you Physics and Maths related questions to it? I was coding a while ago and I had a pretty complex questions which could not be solved by a very popular reddit coding community but Bing Chatbot gave an answer to it in an instant! I was genuinely impressed. Apparently it checks for answers on multiple webpages on the internet, it reads and understands what it reads and it gives the answer to it after combining the knowledge it gained from it's search. Again, the question I asked was pretty complex but it was able to answer it in an instant and it was the right answer! It was coding, it's pretty hard to get the right answer in the first try, I have found it's more "trial and error".

So yeah!

Can I rely partially on Bing Chatbot for math questions?
If not can I ask it to form a query which encapsulates my question perfectly?
If not, should I ask it to "Answer this question and site your sources"?
Can I do something more? i.e., like I did in 3? What are your thoughts on this?

I won't be able to reply to each of your comments anytime soon, but know that I deeply appreciate this community and it's members and their help :')

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blivet@artemis.camp 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They don’t care about factuality, and in fact have no ability to “know” if they are correct. And they don’t “care”

I suspect that most people think (maybe not even consciously) that these models answer questions by retrieving data and then writing a response which incorporates that data, rather than just generating text that may or may not contain actual facts.

It really bears repeating over and over that all these so-called AI systems do is take a prompt and output text in response to it that reads as if a human wrote it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. They may learn other stuff in the process, but at the end of the day all they are doing is predicting the next word/token.

[–] Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They definitely retrieve data too, otherwise you wouldn't be able to send ask them about news events that happened yesterday and get a summary on it.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can also get a summary on news events that didn't happen.

[–] Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I guess that's on you if you're asking it something like "tell me yesterday's news". No matter your feelings on AI our current LLMs are indisputably a great tool for sending emails and summarizing large text as a draft. If you're taking the output and running with it and not relying on any other external sources or proofreading then I could see how someone could come to the conclusion it's 100% terrible awful.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You can tell these things about API calls and they can make API calls.

I have my own GPT4 instance instructed to gather information as necessary so it asks me questions when it needs to.

You can get it to “ask questions” with specific syntax which can then be translated to API calls. This is a way you can get an LLM to consider new information in its tasks.