this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

ChatGPT

31 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss about ChatGPT and AI. Not affiliated with OpenAI.

Rules:

  1. NSFW must be marked as such

  2. No porn

  3. Don't be toxic

  4. jailbreaks are allowed for now at least

  5. No trashposts.

  6. Keep the memes to a minimum

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
GoldenDoge@lemmy.ml
SeeleLowe@lemmy.ml
Senseibull@lemmy.ml
9
2 authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT. Now they're suing, and a 'wave' of similar court cases may follow. (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Spzi@lemm.ee to c/chatgpt@lemmy.ml
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1246165

Two authors sued OpenAI, accusing the company of violating copyright law. They say OpenAI used their work to train ChatGPT without their consent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that's one of the core questions the courts have to answer now. I guess it has a lot to do with automation and precision.

For example, there are libraries where you are free to read certain books cover to cover, but not allowed to copy them and take either home.

Not a perfect analogy but I hope you get the idea. Another case could be made if literal paragraphs appear, without citing the author.

[–] Heratiki@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah those libraries provide differently depending on the person consuming them. I’d go as far as to say punishing people with a learning disability or social anxiety. I can’t see a reasoning behind keeping people from taking them home.