Technology

37742 readers

63 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

So Much for ‘Learn to Code’ (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/technology

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Atlantic Paywall link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AbstractifyBot 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TL;DR for the linked article

The article discusses how the rise of AI may impact computer science careers going forward. While coding jobs have long been seen as stable career paths, chatbots can now generate code in various languages. Developers are using AI tools like Copilot to accelerate routine coding tasks. Within a decade, coding bots may be able to do much more than basic tasks. However, programmers will still be needed to guide AI toward productive solutions. Teaching coding is also becoming more challenging, as students could use chatbots to cheat. Conceptual problem-solving skills will remain important for programmers to apply their expertise where AI falls short. The future may belong to those who can think entrepreneurially about how technology solves problems.

In the end, what students study may matter less than their ability to apply knowledge to technology challenges.

This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

However, programmers will still be needed to guide AI toward productive solutions

So it would still be safe, they'd just be doing different work from what they do now. Same as how other advances in tech stacks made it so we do things differently now than 30 years ago.

People are very adaptable

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?

Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).

[–] RickRussell_CA 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do people still use emacs to code, for example?

Umm. Yes.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?

[–] MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com 5 points 1 year ago

No, all the cool kids use Vim.

[–] sfera 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do people still use emacs to code, for example?

Sure. Why wouldn't they?

[–] Nyoelle 4 points 1 year ago

Hell yea we do use emacs!

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?

Not sure if that's a serious question. Yes. They do. And many use it effectively. I use (neo)vim though because it works for me

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's the key. I haven't written assembly code since the 1990s, I use higher-level abstractions to get to the goal more quickly now. AI-generated code is just yet another layer of abstraction away from machine language.