this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Nature and Gardening

6657 readers
4 users here now

All things green, outdoors, and nature-y. Whether it's animals in their natural habitat, hiking trails and mountains, or planting a little garden for yourself (and everything in between), you can talk about it here.

See also our Environment community, which is focused on weather, climate, climate change, and stuff like that.

(It's not mandatory, but we also encourage providing a description of your image(s) for accessibility purposes! See here for a more detailed explanation and advice on how best to do this.)


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/2643215

ABSTRACT

Biochar is not a structured homogeneous material; rather it possesses a range of chemical structures and a heterogeneous elemental composition. This variability is based on the conditions of pyrolysis and the biomass parent material, with biochar spanning the range of various forms of black carbon. Thereby, this variability induces a broad spectrum in the observed rates of reactivity and, correspondingly, the overall chemical and microbial stability. From evaluating the current biochar and black carbon degradation studies, there is the suggestion of an overall relationship in biochar stability as a function of the molar ratio of oxygen to carbon (O:C) in the resulting black carbon. In general, a molar ratio of O:C lower than 0.2 appears to provide, at minimum, a 1000-year biochar half-life. The O:C ratio is a function of production temperature, but also accounts for other impacts (e.g., parent material and post-production conditioning/oxidation) that are not captured solely with production temperature. Therefore, the O:C ratio could provide a more robust indicator of biochar stability than production parameters (e.g., pyrolysis temperature and biomass type) or volatile matter determinations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LallyLuckFarm 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel as though it makes sense intuitively - other refining techniques that drive or cook off impurities also increase the quality of the final product, and seem to expel a higher percentage as the operating temperature rises to optimal given the application.

Still, good science means testing the things one might take for granted, and some of those tables were incredibly linear regardless of whether the char was synthetic or natural.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used char cooked at about 380C in my MSC. The idea being that the less staw char would be more easily mineralized and improve soils faster than higher temp char. On top of that my soils has pHs of about 7.5 so I really didn't want a liming effect.

[–] LallyLuckFarm 1 points 1 year ago

pHs of about 7.5

Yeah, I can't imagine wanting to drive that higher. Our last tests put us around 5.5 up in the field so a moderate liming effect isn't unwelcome in those areas.