this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
25 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trust would have seen someone point out โ€œThis person is not who you think he is.โ€ and the speaker realizing โ€œOh shit, youโ€™re right. We had better cancel these ceremonies.โ€

My interpretation of this is that someone would have had to know that this person is not who he thought he was, and given him the heads-up.

[โ€“] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With trust, parties look out for each other for the betterment of the group. Just like you have done here โ€“ having recognized that something wasn't quite right and brought it to my attention. (And on that note I have attempted to make that statement more clear on your recommendation. I do hope I have succeeded this time.)

I assume absolutely nobody took the time to look at the honouree. Most likely because nobody actually gives a rat's ass about his background. If there was trust, it could have been broken if the group pointed out that this person is not worthy of being honoured and the speaker went ahead with it anyway, but to do nothing and then throw him under the bus because nobody cared means there was no trust to begin with.