this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
17 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/8043511

Excellent tool from independent media org The Maple.

Spoiler turns out it's basically all of them

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shelter is a requirement, whether employed or not.

Shelter may be, but shelter and housing are not synonymous.

Given that I have never changed where I live in order to take a job,

So if we moved you to Wager Bay, Nunavut, nothing about your profitability prospects would change?

Another reason for my housing choices is related to hobbies. Itโ€™s hard to do hobby manufacturing or host band rehearsals in a condo.

Hobbies are the product of having turned a profit. If the home cannot provide you profit, hobbies are out of the question.

Why would that be necessary or desirable either individually or societally?

If you are not making productive use of an asset, you see no value in passing it along to someone who can?

[โ€“] jadero@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Most of your counterarguments have merit, but I take some exception to your apparent concept of productive use of an asset.

I have put substantial thought, years of planning, labour, and, yes, the profit obtained from my employment into the creation of this asset specifically to enable my chosen way of living and passing time. To say that this is not a productive use of an asset borders on insulting and has no more merit than the claim that a tree has no value until it's been converted to lumber.