this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
39 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This just strikes me that HR & management probably focus on days sick leave taken because its an easy thing to count rather than somehow trying to account for mid & long-term productivity across a period which is difficult to measure.
But also, the average between 2012-2020 was over a period where there was no global pandemic happening. People might want to pretend that in 2022 covid was over, but that's just wishful retrospective thinking, it still happening, and even if folks don't have to isolate now if you're too sick to work, you're too sick to work.
True, if something can easily be measured it will become a goal to minimise/maximize.
Regardless of its actual usefulness.
And it's easy to spin sick days as "the government forcing employers to allow employees to steal time from the employer".
The absurdity is calling it "lost" productivity. If I got to work sick and infect two others who become incapable of working. Thats doubled the cost and was a preventable productivity loss. If it was, say, COVID, and those two others died then what's the productivity loss?
Penny-wise pound-foolish thinking.
Any business that fails because they get 240 days/year rather than 250 days/year from employees deserves to fail.