this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
145 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1082 readers
10 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 112 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They had such a huge amount of brand recognition and vocabulary associated with their site and Elon just decided to kill that

[–] flipht@kbin.social 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No one will convince me he isn't doing this on purpose to tank the brand.

He and his buddies were mad that they couldn't compete. So he made the offer in a manic moment, and then was forced to go through with it. Now that he's got it, he's going to destroy it, and use the loss to reduce his taxes from all his government contracts.

And he simultaneously gets to platform fascists and silence people calling out the powerful. Wins all around.

For a normal person, this looks like failing. I totally get that. But rich people can derive massive benefits from stuff that would ruin us, and every single thing Musk is doing benefits him in some way.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

This phrase doesn't really work if someone is trying to be malicious in the first place. I usually see it used when someone's intentions were good but they were just stupid about it. That's not really the case here

It's possible that Elon tried to do something malicious, and failed because of stupid choices. It's also true that the outcome also benefits him.

I will attribute it to malice regardless

[–] flipht@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That assumes all things are equal.

They rely on you repeating this adage to get away with this shit. It's too consistent. If he were actually stupid, he'd face negative consequences, which is something these folks very rarely have to do.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're rich enough you can just buy your way out of most consequences.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

America™; as much freedom (and justice!) as you can afford.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Land of the Free*

^*some^ ^conditions^ ^apply^

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Since Elmo isn't playing with his own money, the investors and banks who gave him that money are going to be mad if all he did is run the company into the ground.

He got like 13 billion from banks.

Only a small part came from his own Tesla stocks.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 year ago

It’s like Kleenex rebranding to V and then telling everyone to refer to them as tissues.

It’s absolutely batshit. Way to destroy a strong brand, and any brand recognition.