this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
363 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
30 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

β€œWe know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ya. It sounds like they wanted to raise the rent to $3500 which the landlord clearly thought was being reasonable for this building. They bitched about it so the landlord raised the rent high enough to get rid of them.

Sounds like the gambled and lost. Instead of going to the news, they should have tried to negotiate back to $3500 or something close. Good luck now.

[–] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bumping the rent from $2500 to $3500/month is clearly not reasonable.

[–] ddkman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This really depends. If the building is rentable for 5000 than it is. Like it or not.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If 2500 was reasonable back then, then it still is reasonable right now.

Unless gigantic upgrades were performed to the house that warrant a 1000 price hike, which I highly doubt.

Just because the market is fucked doesn't mean you get to make the market even worse.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If accepting a lease on a post-2018 construction, knowing that no rent control was in force, was reasonable then, it is still reasonable now. Live with your choices.

[–] erg@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

having no rent control is never reasonable. People only accepted places without rent control because all other options are shit too

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. To accept a lease on a property that you know doesn't have automatic rent control, and to not contractually obligate the landlord to long-term price controls in that rental agreement, is reckless. They took the high risk gamble and lost. Such is life. But to then complain that their high risk scheme, which was done to screw over other renters who are more careful, didn't work out is plain antisocial behaviour.

[–] ddkman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Except the price of food building materials renovation costs went up by about 100% where i live realistically. So a landlord isn't going to just take the fact that their 2500 whatever is now only worth 1700 whatevers.

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

You like profiting from others misery. It's not illegal and it's not generally even frowned upon but it's still shitty and you have to own it

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

You realize that there's people living in these apartments right? You know there's a housing crisis right now that's fueled by housing investors from all over the world and shit like Airbnb and corporate greed, right?

[–] countflacula@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It's so cool how you can lose your home for disagreeing with a landlord.