this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
361 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1034 readers
19 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@kbin.social 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copyright only exists so rich people can own yet another thing they didnt make.

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original intent was good. You make something, you can legally ensure people can't just copy your work and slap their name on it for profit. People could make creative works without fear of someone else ripping it away from them.

Then Disney just kept bribing politicians to extend it to a ridiculous degree so they wouldn't lose Mickey to public domain until they moved his likeness into their trademark, which lives as long as it's being used actively.

And then you have DMCA, where everyone is guilty until innocent and that whole can of worms, and DRM which is technically illegal to circumvent no matter how much time or what reason. Corporatization and the Internet turned that relatively simple and good ideas into an utter mess.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

that original intent never mattered. no one's gonna make mickey mouse shorts and people be like "oh that must be their character, not Disney's". Mickey became famous and profitable from Disney's amazing animation and enjoyable writing. Without copyright, that's still the case. Queen and David Bowie didnt fall from financial or celebrity grace because Vanilla Ice copied them, because being copied doesnt detract from you. Again, all it did was enable the rich to profit from more things they didnt make. Get rid of all of it.