It's completely bonkers that JPEG-XL is as good as it is and no one wants to actually implement it into web browsers
flameguy21
I swear reality is getting so weird that I didn't realize this was satire
This should be considered a war crime
Yeah but I'll be dead so not my problem lmao
It sounds stressful but it really isn't. Just destroy random crates/dark plant things with the dark/light beam and you'll have basically all the ammo you need.
Wait, this is AI? (looks at hands) oh goddammit
Not being able to bind the controller on PC is even more insane to me. Why can I change my entire keyboard layout but not change the controller AT ALL?
It's mental to me that most console games still don't let you change the controller bindings like you can on PC.
No one's talking about it because it costs $30 more than just buying the physical version outright
I see Picard Maneuver posting and I know nothing about Star Trek lol
I barely remember anyone from Reddit. Too many people to ever see any consistent names (except on smaller subs). I see reccuring people on Lemmy pretty frequently though.
Basically smaller file sizes than JPEG at the same quality and it also automatically loads a lower quality version of the image before it loads a higher quality version instead of loading it pixel by pixel like an image would normally load. Google refuses to implement this tech into Chrome because they have their own avif format, which isn't bad but significantly outclassed by JPEG-XL in nearly every conceivable metric. Mozilla also isn't putting JPEG-XL into Firefox for whatever reason. If you want more detail, here's an eight minute video about it.