Yeah this is insanely invasive. Also just say by Meta. Meta owns Instagram.
Technology
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I could be mistaken but I think threads might use your Instagram account. Which can be connected to Facebook but not necessarily. So I think they’re marketing it as such.
It doesnt matter what meta gets "linked" according to the app stores, they use ads to triangulate locations (it has been done before), and they want users. Remember the pattern "embrace/federate, enhance/contribute until you have power users, then extinguish/defederate". It worked for Google talk removing jabber as a federated competitor.
Meta values each user at ~10$ per month last I checked, and that is without you paying a subscription.
…they use ads to triangulate locations (it has been done before), and they want users.
Can you elaborate on what you mean?
They don’t need to do any tricks for location, they can get a more reliable zip code estimate from your IP address.
You need the location to serve targeted ads, how can you use ads to triangulate location? That doesn’t make much sense.
I don't have any plans or interest to install the app but i don't think it will flat out refuse to run (like some Chinese apps like Alipay) if you deny permissions