this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
35 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I looked it up, it's around 50 000 liters.

[–] kboy101222@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

So about 25,000 peoples minimum drinking water per day per bouy. Not too bad there.

Or the overall average water usage of ~13.2 people (went with the first number cause I ain't researching things rn)

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

About 50 cubic meters. An Olympic-sized swimming pool is ~660,000 gallons, so it would take over 50 of them to produce that much water in a day.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an engineer and lover of invention, I find the words “wave-powered desalinization” to be damn-near sexually arousing in their elegance and promise.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Slaps ocean; this baby practically desalinates itself!

[–] kbal@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a better source of info about this? I've found "good news" in the names of things to be a reliable indicator of people who seem to believe they're trying to make the world better while polluting the information environment as much as any other fake news site. I'd rate the article as slightly less credible than a press release from the company itself.

[–] rwhitisissle 12 points 1 year ago

The thing is that you probably won't find anything that looks too closely at the efficacy of the claims, because the claims are all that anything is reporting on, since the product is so new. Here is a similar article published on asme.org (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), that discusses the buoys and the company's claims surrounding them: https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/tapping-the-ocean

[–] palitu@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

That is a really cool idea. We often think of renewable energy as electricity. But this bypasses that.

I hope it catches on, and is affordable.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks to the power of capitalism, we can be assured that this technological breakthrough will never be put into practice

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because nobody wants to sell this?

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Because the people in a position to need to pay for desalination of their water are too poor for it to be profitable*

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll make as much as I can, and Nestle will buy every single drop.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nestle should be encouraged to get their water from wave powered desalination

load more comments (1 replies)