this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
12 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lildictator@feddit.nl 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We don't have enough information. As long as she kept her work in school separated from her OnlyFans, I see nothing wrong with her having a second job.

This sentence is ambiguous:

Among them is allegedly posting material on public social media accounts that "involves the sexualization of the school environment."

Is this implying that she took any of her OnlyFans pictures while inside the school? That wouldn't be okay. But if what it is referring to, as she alleges, is that she took pictures elsewhere while wearing a school uniform, then the only thing that matters in my mind is whether it was a generic school uniform or the specific uniform used at the school she worked at.

We are generally very hypocritical in matters surrounding porn and sex work.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Good analysis and I tend to agree. There are certainly lines she could cross, but based on the information given it doesn't seem like she did. To those fearing children can be exposed to this, I say, we all know what OnlyFans is by now. There's a lot of talk going on about letting parents parent, well, here's your chance.

[–] Established_Trial@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I agree, and your comment is spot on to what i was thinking as i read the article

[–] TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago

"You don't pay me enough to tell me what to do when I'm not at work" seems like the best response.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps they should pay teachers enough that they don't feel the need to take on second jobs.

[–] frozenicecube@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Education assistant, but yea same thought applies.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

As I said elsewhere in response to this story:

What's needed is for a bunch of education workers to hold a public rally somewhere off of school grounds with as many people as possible naked from the waist up.

Baring of breasts in public is legal in Canada. It should not be legal to fire someone for engaging in legal activities while not at the disposal of the employer. If what she was doing was legal, then it's nobody's business but hers.

[–] Arayvenn@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How can they fire her for this? Are they not opening themselves up for a wrongful termination suit since she didn't do anything illegal or violate the employment agreement?

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I think this does open them up to a wrongful termination suit. But I also highly suspect the employment agreement listed something vague about 'a public image that positively reflects on the employer' or some shit like that. It almost always does for teachers and other workers in schools. Might not hold up in court, but I bet it was in the employment agreement in some form.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The view we take is, there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation. What's done in private between adults doesn't concern the Criminal Code."

  • Minister Trudeau ....... in 1967
[–] Gazing2863@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

To be fair that quote doesn't really hold true when someone is posting what they do in the bedroom online :P. Though this isn't a criminal thing anyway.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

This is so sad but the worst part is that we pay our EA's so horribly they have to supplement their income with an OnlyFans account? Let that sink in everyone.

[–] CkrnkFrnchMn@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

She seems nice...

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί