this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
557 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

18 readers
2 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 110 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I still don’t understand how lobbying is legal. Like, it’s straight up bribery.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago

Because the people who decide what is legal are the people who benefit from it.

[–] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lobbying is supposed to be making your case to a politician, and hoping they vote/propose a bill/etc. With that interest in mind. You yourself are allowed to lobby your congress critters...technically.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

We're allowed, but without a fruit basket stuffed with money they're not going to listen.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The lobbying is not the problem. The donations that sway opinions are the problem. If it was entirely unrelated to donations and the congress person was just hearing out all sides of an issue, that's a good thing.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Donations aren't to sway opinion they're to maintain a stock of dependent politicians who already agree with your position but who also need your funding to stay in office

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

clearly he's old enough to run again.

[–] s20@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man. The guy can grow peanuts, build thousands of houses, kick cancer's ass, and is brilliantly insightful.

No wonder he lost reelection. He's competent. I'm kinda shocked he won in the first place. We didn't deserve him, and we still don't.

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

Well, between that and Reagan and Iran Hostage Crisis.

That and his own party turned against him when it became apparent he cared more about the country than their profits

[–] blazera@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

The initials, the carpentry, the advocations for peace and against extreme wealth. You'd think a certain group would like this guy.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

It's a feudal system of corporate lords with a priesthood of economists, politicians, and lawyers.

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago
[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Jimmy Carter is a fucking legend

[–] muertinez@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Too bad this guy wasn't in a position to do anything about that back when that started happening.

That was sarcasm

[–] centof@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

And yet people will still get upset at you, if you express any viewpoint not in line with a party line. Guess the oligarchs are winning.