this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

Steam Deck

187 readers
1 users here now

Universal community link
!steamdeck@lemmy.ml

Rules

Order

Models

64GB eMMC LCD
256GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe OLED
1TB NVMe OLED

Allowed languages

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dlove67@feddit.nl 30 points 1 year ago

"Delay" is a weird term to use. It was never even hinted that there would be one soon.

[–] darkghosthunter@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That argument that any SoC upgrade wouldn’t be noticeable right now is partially true. A better SoC can be fabricated, but that would offset any cost Valve would willing to accept given the current Steam Deck pricing.

It’s better to wait for what AMD creates. Surely they’re preparing new RDNA and ZEN architectures, plus TSMC new nodes. Those guys have an special sub-node to target low power devices, being the latest the one Apple eats every iPhone launch.

If they pushed a new Steam Deck, it would be marginally better and most folks wouldn’t be so compelled to upgrade. Also, you fragment your development team, now you have to maintain two devices.

Yeah, it’s better to wait a good timing when AMD and TSMC aligns, then you push forward and you offset the prior 4 year old model.

[–] Fidelity9373@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

Given how repairable the steam deck already is, it'd be nice if it could be pushed one step further and make some sort of mini-socket for the SoC.

Obviously that's not a Valve thing to do but an AMD, and trying to downscale a desktop CPU socket style is primed for failure (a lot of companies are soldering on for a reason), but if AMD could make a standardized "whole system chip" that can just be swapped every generation, you wouldn't have to purchase the chassis over and over again.

[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

The Steam Deck is fucking awesome, a refresh at this point would be ridiculous.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Annual phone refreshes make perfect sense.

You don't have to buy a new one every year. But a stable production cycle is very useful at the volume Apple moves. Spikes and troughs for a multiple year cycle would be much more difficult to manage, and if you do actually need a phone at the end of a 3 or 5 year production cycle, you end up with a product 2 or 4 years of development behind what you could have, without even getting the benefit of being able to get it at the price of a phone a couple cycles behind.

The steam deck is functionally a console. It doesn't have the volume to manage the same frequency of new devices.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Annual phone refreshes make perfect sense.

Honestly, they don't though.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, they absolutely do. It would completely murder the supply chains to have such massive droughts in demand, and it would be extremely hardcore fucking over customers who had to have a phone in the period near the end of those terrible cycles by immediately making their phones obsolete.

If Tim Cook announced tomorrow that he had a proven cure for cancer and that he was also cutting the phone cadence from one year to five, he should be fired the same day. Annual updates are the only valid approach.

[–] Sterben@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It is better for those who bought the Steam Deck on day 1. I will definitely buy Steam Deck 2.

[–] Goo_bubbs@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

Delay?? The original Deck isn't even 2 years old yet.

[–] missingno@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't need a higher spec Steam Deck, most of what I play is all 2D indie games anyway. What I really want to see someday is a Steam Deck Pocket in a DS-sized form factor.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Couldn't you just use a cellphone with a controller at that point?