this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
24 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several Peel District School Board students, parents and community members are concerned about a seemingly inconsistent approach to a new book weeding process intended to ensure school library books are inclusive, but that appears to have led some schools to remove thousands of books published in 2008 or earlier.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sounds a lot like Fahrenheit 451.

Unfortunately they won't be able to read it because it was published before 2008.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Libraries across the country follow weeding plans to dispose of damaged, moldy and outdated books and to ensure their collections remain a trusted source of current information.

Libraries not Landfills, a group of parents, retired teachers and community members says it supports standard weeding, but shares Takata's concerns about both fiction and nonfiction books being removed based solely on their publication date.

CBC Toronto reviewed a copy of the internal PDSB documents Ellard's group obtained, which includes frequently asked questions and answers provided to school staff by the board, and a more detailed manual for the process titled "Weeding and Audit of Resource in the Library Learning Commons collection."

The documents lay out an "equitable curation cycle" for weeding, which it says was created to support Directive 18 from the Minister of Education based on a 2020 Ministry review and report on widespread issues of systematic discrimination within the PDSB.

PDSB's "equitable curation cycle" is described generally in the board document as "a three-step process that holds Peel staff accountable for being critically conscious of how systems operate, so that we can dismantle inequities and foster practices that are culturally responsive and relevant."

Bernadette Smith, superintendent of innovation and research for PDSB, is heard responding on the recording, saying it was "very disappointing" to hear that, because she said that's not the direction the board is giving in its training for the process.


The original article contains 1,667 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It they are digitized or have digitized version that students can just download for free then I don't really mind they recycle them. Heck, even held a auction for old books about to be removed and let the book lovers get them cheap.(then recycle the rest.)

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The digitized version won't be sitting on a shelf catching the eye of curious students though. Discoverability suffers significantly.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely!

This is my big hate for online stores in general, but books especially. I find browsablility far superior to searchability. Being searchable obviously has its place, as do recommendation systems, but nothing beats just looking around and discovering what you didn't even know existed.