this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

Fiction Books

40 readers
1 users here now

The discussion of fiction books! Please tag spoilers and follow instance rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

By this I mean, a book you had to brace yourself to read, and you feel proud for having read. Did you enjoy the process of reading it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seven eves. The author indulges a little too much in technical details. At points, for pages.

[–] Omentree@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

I thought it was very good. Stephenson does have a tendency to get really into whatever the subject matter of his story is, eg. cryptography in cryptonomicon, MMOs and gaming in REAMDE, Alan turing and AI in The Diamond Age etc. I find it to be an endearing aspect lf his writing. Definitely recommend Seveneves.

[–] CmdrUlle@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

End then, as typical, the "end" is done in a haste. My only gripe with him (and this book in particular)

[–] angelsomething@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I could not agree more.

[–] clgoh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought it was the easiest Neal Stephenson's book. (That I've read.)

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Le Morte d'Arthur, by Thomas Mallory, in Middle English.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s impressive! Why did you read it? And did you enjoy it in some way?

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I chose it for an English literature class, as I was always fascinated by Arthurian legend. The teacher thought I was mad, and was probably right. But it was more that I didn't know what I was getting myself into.

I was adept at French, which really helped. But it was a long slow read. Looking back I don't know how I managed other than to ignore the parts I really didn't understand. It was pre internet hahah.

In the end, I'd say yes, I did enjoy it. It's always stuck with me, and I automatically compare every Arthurian story (book, movie, etc) to what I remember from it - which I guess makes sense.

But ultimately it's very sad. Almost depressing. And the dryness of it makes it feel like it could have really happened.

Damn, your question is enticing me to it up again!

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco. I enjoyed reading it, but it demanded my full attention to appreciate it.

EDIT: I enjoyed it like hard exercise, a long hike, or landscaping a garden. It's tough, you're tired, but you're also proud.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

By Eco I only started “The Name of the Rose” and abandoned it after a short while. I should give it another go.

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Julius Caesar's Commentarii De Bello Gallico in Latin. And... yes I did enjoy it. There are some points where translation just cannot capture Caesar's wit. I wish I still knew enough Latin to read it again.

(Why yes I am a huge fucking nerd, how could you tell?)

[–] Squids@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ulysses! The Joyce one. Honestly I enjoyed it - for how esoteric and sort of distant it is, the base plot itself is kinda mundane so it's not like the base structure of the book is massively hard to follow (especially if you're familiar with The Odyssey) once you get over the constant writing style shifts. It's randomly funny and weirdly relatable (like being stuck in a conversation with a chatty American) and gives you so many reasons to hate the British. I really like how it's adapted the story of The Odyssey and I think more adaptions of Greek works should be like it - an adaption of the themes and vague plot beats rather than just taking the characters and doing whatever the fuck you want with them, and also should have one guy who inexplicably thinks he's actually in an adaption of a Shakespeare play instead.

I will say though, my copy of Ulysses is one third appendix, which explains out the schema and has footnotes for most of the references that will just go right over your head if you don't happen to be James Joyce and I genuinely don't understand how you could read that book without it. It really turns every confusing reference and story moment into something clear and understandable which elevates the text around it. If I didn't have it I most definitely would've dropped the book

Also I'm nowhere near finished but I've started reading Dream of the Red Chamber (aka Story of the Stone) which is an 18th century Chinese novel infamous for being really long (I think it's like over 2k pages? My copy is divided up into like five books) and difficult to follow with way too many characters in it. It's a big long deconstruction of Confucianism and nobility following a chunk of the heavens who's reincarnated into a failing noble family because he wants to see what it's like being human, only to be treated like absolute shit by his family because everyone see him as a divine blessing and want to use and abuse him as much as possible for their own ends. He spends a lot of time around the women of the house and watches their own tragedies unfold, hence the length and excessive characters. Hasn't gotten too bad yet, but I'm also barely into it relatively speaking.

[–] davefischer 2 points 1 year ago

I read Dream of the Red Chamber a looooong time ago. Might try it again some time soon....

I enjoyed The Scholars much more. (And reread it recently.)

[–] KingGeedorah@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky. Rewarding slog but a slog for sure.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I liked it much better than the beginning of Crime and Punishment. It helps that I love philosophical side-quests.

[–] KingGeedorah@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It is my favorite book and the philosophical side quests are why I love it but it is a long, dense read

[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

I am reading it now. Little beyond 80%. Except for the initial ~20% I found it to be a page turner. Loving it!

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Joseph Conrad's book, Nostromo, was a bit dense for me. I did enjoy it though. Not sure if that meets the requirement. There are a few books I've been bracing myself to read that I've chickened out on starting. Things like Cormac McCarthy's books.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Cormac McCarthy doesn't fuck around.

[–] StarServal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven’t read it, but reading about it makes me think it would be this book: House of Leaves.

[–] Snowyday@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

I’ve read it. Definitely a challenge

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

It’s in my reading pile! I’ll give it a try “soon”

[–] neocamel@lemmy.studio 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm about halfway through Dante's Inferno at the moment.

I started reading it about ten years ago...

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

Are you reading it in Italian or in a translation?

I read most of it in high school and the rest on my own. Reading it fully on your own is a feat! Do you have a commented edition? What do you like of it?

[–] amio@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read through Adventures of Tom Sawyer/Huckleberry Finn at one point. They were fine, had to google a few archaisms. Not exactly thrillers, but even as a euro, I just felt the Americana, I guess. Charming as a period thing.

On the other hand, I read 1984 and was actually surprised at how engaging it was. Major bummer, obviously, but I expected it to be an effort. It held its own and kept me reading.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Probably Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad. It's so damned bleak that I had to force my way through it. It's a great book, but I didn't enjoy it.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

I understand. I disliked every bit of it, because it was bleak and dark in a sticky way, if that makes sense. I think it’s a good book because it definitely achieve to criticize the economy of the time, but it doing it it becomes an un-enjoyable book.

Cloud Atlas

It's a postmodern masterpiece, but fucking hell the use of language makes it tough.

[–] TheCrispyDud@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky it got a bit interesting after the halfway mark but damn was it dry in the first half.

For a pure joy read there was the unabridged Romance of the Three Kingdoms. For a book the size of an encyclopedia it was a fast feeling read.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

“Os Maias” by Eça de Queirós was exactly like that. Forced upon every 11th grader. I’ve read much longer books before, but it’s with lots of hatred that I finished it

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read The Third Pandemic and Sphere in 5th grade, back in the 90s. I had to carry a dictionary with me for them, but I still remember most of the stories to this day.

I learned a lot, but the process of reading them involved a lot of teachers telling me it was too adult for me (probably because they didn’t understand them), so that wasn’t fun, but ultimately I did enjoy the process. It helped make me who I am now.

I don’t find books particularly challenging at this point (I’m now a 600-700 word per minute speed reader, depending on material, with tested 98% retention) but I have to brace to read legal text, or anything that’s written to sound smart rather than be accessible. But that’s just because those aren’t ever fun to read for anyone.

[–] Behaviorbabe@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Skinners verbal behavior. Woof.

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gravity’s Rainbow. I’d taken classes in postmodernism and still found it so difficult to focus. I’m not sure if I enjoyed the reading process, but I felt good for having completed it. Took 2 attempts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

Don Quijote in Spanish. Tough to get through, but worth it.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The second, and even more so the third, book in the Ender's Game series.

I looked the first so much I kept pushing through the others, hoping they would get better. They did not.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

I still had the second in my reading list, sad to hear it’s not worth it. Can you explain why?

[–] Cherenkov_Effect@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anathem by Neal Stephenson is a tough book to get through, but extremely rewarding if you do.

I found Blindsight by Peter Watts to be a hard read mostly because a lot of the philosophy went right over my head. Good book though.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

'Anathem.' Got about 20 pages in and threw it down, because it was just Stephenson being deliberately confusing. Someone advised me to stick with it, but warned me that it took about 200 pages for the plot to get going. Skipped over the last section with all the multiple world nonsense.

I did read all three books of the Baroque Cycle, but threw Book One at the wall when I got to the end and found the damn gloassary hidden away like a pearl in an oyster.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I loved Anathem, but the ending was a bit too much all over the place for my taste. I honestly enjoy random philosophical discussions, so the first third of the book was my bread and butter.

Stephenson is a weird author, Anathem is great, I enjoyed the Criptonomicon but really did not like Snow Crash.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Try 'Reamde.' It's Stephenson's version of a Jack Ryan novel. Billionaire's niece is kidnapped by the Russian mob...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beto@lemmy.studio 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gödel, Escher, Bach. I was only able to read the whole thing because I was in a ship for a month without TV or internet.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I loved it, it taught me so much. But it was a tough bone to crack for sure!

[–] beto@lemmy.studio 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I want to read it again! Maybe when I'm retired! 🙂

[–] boson@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi
  • Vita Nostra by Sergey and Marina Dyachenko

Both are underrated or underrepresented

[–] aendarus@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We Contain Multitudes by Ed Yong is about microbes inside us and animals and I have no idea why I read it, but it was difficult to read because I'm terrible at biology. Still cool though

Edit: Oh, I didn't realise this is the fiction comm. Oops. I guess I don't read any challenging fiction books. Maybe I should rectify that

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It would be The Road by Cormac McCarthy, if I could read it, but it's forever above my reading level.

[–] marron12@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

David Copperfield. I read it in one day when I was a kid and had nothing else to do. Bleak House was a slog too, but it had some nice turns of phrase that stuck with me.

And at the risk of insulting a classic, One Hundred Years of Solitude. I get that it's supposed to be a critique on society and inspired by the author's life. I just found it bleak.

[–] davefischer 1 points 1 year ago

Stefan Wul - Oms en Serie. Difficult because my french isn't that great. Interesting because it was adapted as Fantastic Planet. Great book. Wul is weird.

load more comments
view more: next ›