TechTakes

41 readers

20 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

How do you make book banning even worse? Ask ChatGPT which books to ban (www.popsci.com)

submitted 1 year ago by blakestacey@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Broke: republican book banning

Woke: don’t ban books

Roke(o): On one hand I am a fan of regressive content bans, but allowing ChatGPT to decide which books get banned is how we get the basilisk!!!

[–] 200fifty@awful.systems 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

I mean it's certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can't argue with this logic

[–] zogwarg@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

It ain't honest but it's easy work!

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

How to be paranoid and lazy as fuck at the same time.

[–] feistel@sns.feistel.party 1 points 1 year ago

@blakestacey "Each of [the titles of] these texts was reviewed using AI software"