this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
523 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

431 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago (6 children)

SUV, Truck, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV, sedan, SUV, SUV, SUV, SUV.

The culture problem around big vehicles we've created with bad regulation and aggressive marketing is depressing.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It isn't just a culture problem, it's a tragedy of the commons.

When you're surrounded by giant vehicles, the only way to ~~be~~ feel safe and see the road is to have a giant vehicle.

[–] DJDarren 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it’s a tragedy of the commons.

A gentle heads up that the guy who coined that term was a huge piece of shit, and was almost certainly wrong.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

The basic notion regarding the exploitation of limited, unregulated public resources leading to depletion is significantly older than that term or the essay with that title..

The notion is echoed by a lot of thinkers, including that of Karl Marx in his deconstruction of capitalism. We need to make a society aware of this tendency much the way we have to be mindful, as a society, of prejudice divisionism.

Otherwise, overexploitation of common resources is going to kill us if we can't find a way to circumvent the problem, such as by reaching out into space as local resources become dire.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sadakos_left_nut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So glad they put that thick protective white line there so I know I won’t be hit 🥰

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

It’ll be super protective when it snows!

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you are walking you're either poor or up to no good, in both cases we don't want you around these parts. Oh, your kids need to walk? Don't be lazy and DRIVE them where they need to go!

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Don’t be lazy and DRIVE

For the briefest of moments I felt a spark of blinding hot rage in my heart. Now I am left with the lingering feeling of wanting to smash my head against a rock.

Thank you for that experience.

use a bike with a baby seat or passenger seat instead of driving

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What in the stupid is this?

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cheaper than a sidewalk, apparently.

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 12 points 1 year ago

The cost being the life of pedestrians? This is insane.

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why even allow people in this neighborhood? Just have cars and no people

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 9 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, self driving cars will get us there eventually

[–] LynneOfFlowers@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

Next they'll eliminate the stripe and put up share-the-road signs with the stick figure

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Is that a pedestrian symbol or the chalk outline of a pedestrian who got hit?

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This what I hate about North America. Non walkable neighbourhoods.

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Weirdly enough it is a walkable neighborhood legit this is the entire street in the picture, for some reason they decided to paint these people lanes instead of just leaving it.

[–] max@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Can you believe it that some see walkable neighbourhoods as a conspiracy? I just can’t wrap my head around why…

[–] biddy@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

Who would use this? Wouldn't you either walk on the grass or clearly in the middle of the street?

[–] Lowered_lifted 9 points 1 year ago

They saw people walking in the road because there are no sidewalks and decided to paint a line, brilliant, job well done.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine seeing this when house hunting and still buying the house. You'd have to have worms in your brain to want one of these ugly McMansions with no sidewalk

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh these ain’t McMansions, they’re the “missing middle” it’s basically row houses but with car centric infrastructure

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That doesn't look like middle-density housing, it's just slightly more dense low-density housing

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Soooo...a sidewalk without the extra pavement?

[–] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Who the hell designed this? I want to see the person who made this burn in hell

[–] Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au 5 points 1 year ago

You can be lying inside this line just like that guy!

[–] ChargedBasisGrand@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if anyone in this community uses a car you are part of the problem

[–] Hank@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

On the other hand, there isn't another option you have in that community.

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

This community is super walkable and is a good 5 min walk to a big grocery store too

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

indeed. it's a systemic problem, not an individual problem. we need a network of protected bike lanes, a fuck ton more transit, and zoning reform

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fake or not in the US? It definitely looks like standard USA fare, but this is not a pedestrian symbol I've ever seen

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fake, but not terribly far from reality in some areas.

Anywhere upper middle class enough to have lawns like that will have proper sidewalks. But in poor neighborhoods, sometimes local government just doesn't bother spending money to make sidewalks at all. But they also don't bother to paint any lines in the road. It's just road - no sidewalks, no bike lanes, no whatever these are. Just roads.

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It’s not fake, and weirdly enough it’s in a rich neighbourhood (or at least u need to be rich to be able to buy a house here)

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It is exactly reality on some roads in my area. My town is growing and decently high income for the area, but some of the very first neighborhoods have drainage ditches along the roads rather than proper storm drains. So they are smaller, less expensive houses, but they are in the center of town with good access to everything.

So that leads to lots of sidewalks being built, trying to make things more connected and walkable, but certain roads have this exact “we painted a line and a walk symbol” sidewalk. The walk symbol looks correct though, not the weird one in the op.

[–] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Not in the US, but Canada!

[–] honeynut@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ask for a bike lane and hopefully you can get multi-use gutters

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Only in America

[–] pizza@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if lines can keep out sea bears, obviously they can keep out these pesky pedestrians from getting in front of my SUV!

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

It's the Sea Rhinos you should be more concerned about.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is blasphemy. What should we call walking on the side of the road in some sort of designated zone?

[–] JBloodthorn@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

"Asking to get hit by a car"