this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
981 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
49 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

As it very well should be. Fuck Google.

[–] crow 8 points 1 year ago

Looking on the bright side here, this will be good for applications that depend heavily on Chromium such as Steam. It won’t be much good, but it’s something.

[–] BitOneZero 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] fsniper@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Did Opera announced any intent?

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave and Vivaldi (and edge) have no say in the matter, they are practically in the business of rebranding chrome for what it is and contributed to reinforcing goggle's monopoly. I have absolutely no sympathy for them.

[–] nils@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

At least Brave forks Chromium and they have a bunch of patches they apply to the codebase. I mean yeah, they still contribute to the Chromium monopoly but calling them just a rebrand is a bit unfair in my opinion

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›