this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30561 readers
20 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] query 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The proposal also said, "To the extent that there is any risk, it is easily outweighed by the benefits to consumers and businesses of using this [Facial Age Estimation] method."

What benefits are there to consumers? Here's one more way you can be denied access.

There has to be zero benefits for all adults, and tbh I don't see the big risk for minors in accessing entertainment that they're mature enough to intentionally seek out. Content descriptions and parents communicating with their kids should cover the vast majority of use cases.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of it of course comes back to parents not actually wanting to parent. The rules are already in place. Literally all you have to do is not buy Timmy the game.

[–] ArcticCircleSystem 1 points 1 year ago

Not quite. The main groups who push this crap, IIRC, tend to be the same groups of far-right evangelicals who insist on homeschooling their children because "public schools are liberal indoctrination" and totally not because they're trying to isolate their child so it's easier to abuse them. ~Strawberry

[–] argv_minus_one 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, let me get this straight. They want to peer into the homes and bedrooms of children all over the world? Gather photographs of them? 😬

And how do they expect this to work on a gaming PC with no camera?

Also, their comment form says not to submit any personally identifiable information, such as your name, and yet it requires you to submit your name, and it says your name will be shown publicly for all to see. To object to a violation of my privacy, I must…allow them to violate my privacy?

[–] Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a good way to get a lot of people to never pay for a video game ever again, after Steam did a pretty good job convincing people not to pirate.

[–] jarfil 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The image is then uploaded to Yoti's backend server for estimation

"Images are immediately, permanently deleted, and not used by Yoti for training purposes."

the facial recognition does not presential a substantial risk to parents' privacy or potential biases.

"To the extent that there is any risk, it is easily outweighed by the benefits to consumers and businesses of using this [Facial Age Estimation] method."

Pretty sure only one of those statements can be true. I'd go with "there is a risk".

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There's no paradox. It says there is a risk, it is not substantial, and the benefits outweigh it.

[–] jarfil 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The paradox is they start claiming no risk... only to step by step admit there is a risk, to end with a "but it's all fine, trust us".

Adding that the images are not going to be used for training purposes by them, is like a robber saying "I didn't break into that store... just the one next door".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] argv_minus_one 7 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile in reality, the risk is a certainty and the benefits don't exist.

[–] sarsaparilyptus@discuss.online 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, assuming they're not lying, which isn't the kind of assumption you should ever make in the tech industry.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Definitely. Their marketing speak may not have any holes in it but wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunspot 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I left my teens a long time ago, but I'm still constantly asked how high school is going for me. There is plenty of risk for an adult with this. Some of us just look like kids forever. 😬

[–] Idrunkenlysignedup 4 points 1 year ago

I got ID'd the other day to buy beer. I'm almost 40.

[–] jherazob 20 points 1 year ago

What could remotely go wrong with creating a permanently online countrywide database of biometric data?

So... take more control away from the parents, who can decide for their own kids what they should and shouldn't be playing. Parents are of the gaming generations now; they're familiar with violence in video games.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"The ESRB has proposed that the FTC greenlight facial recognition technology as a method to detect a user's age"

So little kids won't ve able to play GTA San Andreas anymore? 🥺

[–] LunarticBot 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What about adults that looks extremely young too ?

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No games for young people or people of a race that the model was not trained on or anyone with a disfigurement or anyone in a dark room. Ever.

ESRB be dumb as hell.

@drdiddlybadger @LunarticBot well, yeah

Sports game with literal real money gambling = fun for all ages

Game where someone says a naughty word = 17+ kids would be destroyed by foul language

[–] shuzuko@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah if I'm gonna get digital-carded to play a video game like I get regular-carded for booze at 34, I will absolutely just start pirating everything.

[–] SenorBolsa 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm like 30 I still put my birthday in as 4/20/69 like hell some website needs to know my exact birthday to view a videogame trailer.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 6 points 1 year ago

I can't be bothered to even put a meme birthday. I do 1/1 and then flick my scroll wheel down and click wherever it stops.

[–] unsunny 5 points 1 year ago

That was my first thought; I’m 20 but I look quite a bit younger in real life. I could have some trouble trying to play M rated games legitimately if this is widely implemented. One alternative I can see them using is submitting an ID to bypass, but that’s really invasive just to play a video game.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Neither will John Mulaney or Ben Brainard.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I'm always amazed at the lengths the US game industry will go to on stuff like this rather than just having a proper legally enforceable rating system like PEGI.

[–] monad@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Who asked for this?

[–] storksforlegs 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a nightmarish waste of time.

Also I can see kids outsmarting this thing in two seconds. Just wear a fake beard, a bit of makeup. Boom, Adult.

[–] corytheboyd@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Watching the decline of the internet in real-time is fucking depressing. How long before the FTC lets google “verify the integrity” of every data center in the US, completely eliminating all hope? Doesn’t even sound that crazy anymore.

[–] sculd 7 points 1 year ago

One step closer to Black Mirror

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

So, what happens if you don’t have a video camera hooked up to your console/gaming system of choice? Literally none of mine do. So now I need that as well as the game? Nah, the high seas be callin’, mateys!

[–] shadowfly@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

This is where they get their ideas from.

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

We're this ever to become a thing, seems like everyone could just upload images of a public figure and circumvent it.