this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023

38 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37726 readers

51 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

joinfirefish.org is a bit messy and compliacted (self.technology)

submitted 1 year ago by FelipeFelop to c/technology

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought I would try out firefish/calckey but found a few issues.

I should say I am in my 50s and have been around since I used 1970s BBS so have a reasonable understanding of the Fediverse etc.

But, joinfirefish.org seems to have gone for style over substance. It also doesn’t render properly on Safari (iOS)

Choosing a server to join seems unnecessarily difficult. At the top of the list is firefish.social marked as verified but when you click or tap to find out more you are presented with a coming soon page (not seen one of those since the 90s when everything was Under Construction).

The choice of servers seems limited with a need for more general servers.

It looks like I’m going to need to host my own. But a quick glance seems their’s poor documentation.

What do people think? Can anyone recommend a good general server in English?

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] tranceFusion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read about their name change and wondered what it was. I had a similar experience. Really bad UX. When you click join it asks you if you want to create a new server or join an existing server. I picked “join existing” but the first button on the page is to “submit your server”.

I clicked the “verified” server which was down (and is still down… who goes down for days for a domain change?)

I clicked another server and hit Explore and it showed me a list of pinned users that supposedly had many posts each, however I clicked on various elements such as the post count trying to view them and couldn’t. At that point I just closed my browser tab.

I assume this thing is some sort of Mastodon-like social network but coming in blind it’s hard to tell.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been enjoying Calckey but yes, stability is a problem, as is federation.

[–] FelipeFelop 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, thought I’d try again after a couple of days. Now getting 502 Bad Gateway errors from the joinfirefish site.

Also, some very strange reposting by firefish on mastodon. (possibly meant to do it from a personal account?) Some sort of unseemly personal argument between two people connected with the project that seem to have mental health issues.

[–] FelipeFelop 1 points 1 year ago

The madness continues: the list of servers now shows calckey.social instead of firefish.social. When you click the button to chose it, you’re then invited to sign up to firefish.social. But as soon as you tap it there’s a message that signups are disabled.

You couldn’t make this up.

[–] alyaza 3 points 1 year ago

I read about their name change and wondered what it was. I had a similar experience. Really bad UX. When you click join it asks you if you want to create a new server or join an existing server. I picked “join existing” but the first button on the page is to “submit your server”.

UI seems to be a big, general problem for some of the other federated services. kbin's is atrocious for federation, for example, and we've repeatedly observed its users not seemingly knowing where they are just because of how their feed of content is presented to them.

[–] Aninjanameddaryll@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, I was up and running in five minutes. You pick an instance, you sign up, you verify the email, and you're good to go. What server doesn't matter much, barring it closing unexpectedly and without warning. There's not enough users to need more than a handful.

[–] FelipeFelop 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don’t mind about the local timeline, or that the main language is different or that other users might get it defederated then your approach will work.

[–] kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like finding a good instance in the fediverse (that's accepting users) is always a nightmare.

That being said, I've been happy with the vibes on lemmy.blahaj.zone and they have a calckey/firefish instance (that's the main blahaj.zone). But it's not strictly general-purpose.

[–] quortez@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the dust is still settling (in the middle of a rebrand/namespace migration). I like it as it feels like Mastodon++ and it last links with Lemmy/Kbin.

[–] Jay@firefish.tech 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@FelipeFelop@beehaw.org I am using firefish.tech which is a new server and seems to be working well so far, but it is quite small.

Calckey.world is run by the same people as lemmy.world and mastodon.world and is one of the more active ones listed, they are still settling on a new domain name to go with the upgrade because firefish.world was taken.

The calckey.social server is the calckey/firefish developer's server that is going to migrate to firefish.social, but the devs had some complications when they unveiled the new firefish branding on Wednesday and held off on performing the domain change. Sign ups are closed right now for that one.

[–] AngularAloe 2 points 1 year ago

I'm using calckey.world and it was a bit crunchy at first but is working well now. The userbase at this point is small compared to the mastodon servers we're used to seeing.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't blame free software for not working correctly in Apple's special browser that only exists on their platform. Years ago they were really focused on having a good and standards compliant browser but it's started to become the new Internet Explorer for iPhone. At least on Mac computers you can install a different browser.

[–] FelipeFelop 1 points 1 year ago

That doesn’t make much sense. If firefish want iOS users then they are going to have to make it work on Safari