this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
63 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

378 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

If Neuralink can prove its device is safe in humans, it would still potentially take more than a decade for the start-up to secure commercial use approval

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I won't get one but I'm fine for Elon to break into it. I kinda feel like that's the only thing he does well. Funnels money into concepts people believe are impossible. Fail until there's some small success and let other, more competent people learn from those failures. I think I'd rather have that than stay stagnant and/or have the Russian brain chip become the standard

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. Let’s see what comes of this. Like I have said, I would welcome a chip if it solves my brain’s issues (instead of side effect laden medication) and it’s likely that the chip I want would be from one of those folks that learn from failure.

[–] Singletona@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The important thing is people can't just casually reprogram the damned thing.

having an ability to diagnose and correct without cracking your head open is fine, but it has to be a way that's 'you're giving positive affirmation that you're OK with it or a medical professional is physically having to plug a thing in or on or ... just so it can't be 'oh hey yo ustepped through these induction plates. we turned your anti-siezure chip off due to your non-compliance.'

[–] userdata0@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

This is a huge nope from me. This is a company that is spearheaded by a man with negative sense of morality and should not be involved in anything that is this morally grey.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

He wants to use this technology to "cure autism," which sounds like it's coming from a position of self-loathing, projected onto everybody else. If he wants to stick chips into his brain, fine, but personally, I don't need a cure for the disease of being me.

[–] poo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Hope he's the first human guinea pig, if he trusts it so much

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

My initial response was a recollection of the plot of The Kingsman.

Sticking implants in brains for fun is stupidity on a stick.

Implants are already used to control some forms of epilepsy, however these are on the vagus nerve and not in the brain. This sort of application makes sense.

Elon should be the first guinea pig, then, see if they can install a chip to make his brain work right

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get huge Deus Ex vibes. During the game, one concept stuck with me in relation to this. There was this woman, that was a doctor, but she wouldn't get hired to work in the hospital, because she didn't have the right chip in her head. She couldn't afford it, so she was unemployed. Such a sad prospect, if this is what leads to that.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Also, S1E1 of Futurama!

[–] YolkBrushWork402@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is gonna end up terrible, why the hell would you want chip in your brain?

[–] kool_newt 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In capitalism, there is no doubt this will be used to compel labor. Imagine if your boss or some authority could inflict severe pain that causes no physical damage until you comply? Hello neo-slavery!

[–] YolkBrushWork402@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds dystopian, this sounds like an episode straight out of Black mirror why the hell would anybody want to support this?(or is there nobody aside from elon supporting it?)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TZUI1hRq@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In socialism, there is no doubt this will be used to compel labor. Imagine if your commissar or some authority could inflict severe pain that causes no physical damage until you comply? Hello neo-slavery!

[–] kool_newt 3 points 1 year ago

In an authoritarian socialist society maybe, like a USSR of 2025. Socialism doesn't imply authoritarianism, e.g. libertarian socialism, anarcho-communism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vedgytones@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Good soldiers follow orders

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›