So you can give some Swedish company access to all your web traffic. Great idea if you hate privacy. At least Tor can get some money this way.
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
789 readers
4 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
@nutomic @cypherpunks Who exactly do trust then comrade? I mean Swedish ISP Bahnhof has a very good reputation when it comes to end user privacy. They even hosted Julian Assanges Wikileaks server... But I mean just look at all the orwellian laws coming from Australia, America, England and the EU where do we go from here bro?? Chat Control, Investigatory powers act bill, Ass Access bill, Restrict Act bill, Chat control... D: World governments are making it hard to have any privacy anymore!
@Rickster @nutomic @cypherpunks As harder some pathetic governments are doing it to have some privacy and stop cancel culture, as faster we evolve towards alternative communication tools.
They can control even the whole internet. We will ditch this service and use mesh networks. Without us paying for the internet, the service will become obsolete.
@mariubrlu @nutomic @cypherpunks Yeah I don't care where we are politically we all need to unite against a centralised, nation state controlled & fully walled up internet... If we don't take a united stand against extremely overly broad all encompassing powers that Western governments are trying to give themselves over the internet. We will become China, we are not far off the chopping block to becoming China and having their internet where all non government approved stuff is criminalised!
@Rickster @nutomic @cypherpunks I was just trying to bring some positive thoughts. Even in China the gvmt tried to crack down on protests by shutting down the internet in the area and the people used a mesh network to still be able to communicate.
@Rickster @nutomic @cypherpunks Of course that I play my part in fighting corruption in the establishment. I recently switched every single device in my home to open source auditable software and literally use 0 services from GAFAM. The thing is: if we don't buy or use their products they will become obsolete. Also by using open source software you can't be illegally spied as they can't have access to your data.
Is the browser not open source? And hence a binary could be built for it to test and verify the degree of privacy to it?
A VPN operator can intercept all the traffic by design. TOR avoids that by going over multiple hops, but this browser doesnt use TOR.
The first thing i did upon installing the browser to test it is uninstall the VPN extention. Im very skeptical of the browser myself but im wondering how much grounds your argument against the browser holds. Wouldnt the open-source nature (and hence being able to create our own binaries) and the firefox base create a decent enough privacy experience? One could even scientifically test the telemetry with the right tools, right?
If you disable the VPN then my previous argument doesnt apply. It would probably be more secure than normal Firefox, assuming you trust the developers.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'll stick with LibreWolf, thanks
I just stumbled upon that, too, and am wondering how this compares to Librewolf (+VPN) ...
I'm wondering the same thing. Aside from encouraging people to use the default settings to make each user's browser/session harder to properly fingerprint, I'm really curious what privacy benefits this new browser provides compared to alternatives like Librewolf, hardened Firefox, etc.
Looks like Mullvad has this regarding the changes being made in their browser: https://mullvad.net/nl/browser/hard-facts
Thanks, this is really helpful! Didn't notice it previously.
From what I've heard in the past, Mozilla is doing a good job upstreaming work from the Tor Browser devs and putting it behind an about:config value, if they don't use it in Firefox. So, assuming your hardened Firefox uses the right config values and browser extensions, there should be relatively few differences...
@Ephera @rhymepurple No. Privacy by option is worse than no privacy at all. Non technical people would install firefox because they read somewhere that it safe, but ultimately they would use it as it is thinking that is safe out of the box.
@rhymepurple@lemmy.ml did specifically ask about hardened Firefox, which literally means Firefox with configuration changes to make it more secure.
Having said that, personally I do think Firefox's default experience is close to the best you can do for people that really just want to install without thinking about it.
Going beyond that quickly results in broken webpages. And broken webpages require that you know what you're doing, so you can unbreak them, if needed.
I cant get user scripts to work with it.
IINM, you shouldn't that because it would defeat the purpose of this browser, which is to maintain the same fingerprint for everybody.
that's what I figured, just wish it said something about it
view more: next ›