Plants save our planet while humans are animals and destroy it. Therefore, they are superior to animals. Q.e.d.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
In a world without plants nearly all animals die. In a world without animals some plants don't reproduce.
Can an animal create sugar from sunlight and carbon dioxide?
Can an animal live for hundreds of years while towering over everything else
Animals are better at running, swimming, and playing piano.
Plants are better at blossoming and photosynthesis.
A lichen-covered sloth has entered the chat.
Yup. Each is better at what it is good at. Neither is, strictly speaking, better than the other.
Plants do communicate and form social bonds. (quick internet search : https://theconversation.com/plants-thrive-in-a-complex-world-by-communicating-sharing-resources-and-transforming-their-environments-156932)
Whoever downvoted this doesn't understand plants and their interactions at all.
animals eat plants
plants were here first
Things just are
who said plants can't communicate too?