this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

10 readers
32 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blazing8215@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

I tried to, but both Vivaldi and Brave had issues I couldn't get over and in the end I decided to have a time out by switching to Firefox ESR with custom policy and autoconfig.

Whatever happens in April will probably take time to land on ESR so I will hopefully have plenty of time to adopt about:config changes or actually switch to another browser.

I don't feel like switching back to LibreWolf, since I already used it ages ago and learnt to make my current setup with upstream Firefox, so it would be kind of pointless and what would I do at Chromium? Three months and ManifestV2 is permanently killed and what extension doesn't say to run better on Firefox? I have been observing at least uBlock Origin (manifest V2), Privacy Badger (v3 in Chrome) and NoScript (also v3) and I think at least GitHub discussions said they all have shortcomings on Chrome.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

This is probably a good opportunity to promote the Lemmy communitiy for LibreWolf: !librewolf@lemmy.ml

[–] OmegaSunkey@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago

I've tried every now and then but could never switch to firefox fully. It was either big ram usage, slowness, or the inability to handle more than 2 tabs. On android. On pc its just the first 2.

Cromite.

[–] Sophocles@infosec.pub 38 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I still don't see Mozilla as a bad actor, especially in comparison with the villany that is google and microsoft. It's still a great alternative for privacy newbies and average users, although I personally made the switch to librewolf (desktop) and iceraven (mobile) a while ago. Both being forks of firefox, development for actual firefox is essential for either of these to survive, so Mozilla still has my support albeit indirectly

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Mozilla’s only reason of existence right now is so that Google can skirt an antitrust case.

Edit: to be clear, that in itself makes it a bad actor.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't subscribe to this theory.

They don't need to keep firefox on life support to avoid an antitrust case. A chromium fork could serve the same purpose.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That might be true, but the fact that the competitor is using their engine as base could be used against them. It also doesn’t change the fact that they have Mozilla wrapped around their finger.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fact that the competitor is using their engine as base could be used against them

Not really.

they have Mozilla wrapped around their finger

There's not really any evidence of that. Sure Mozilla has done some stupid things, and they're not the champions of internet privacy we would like them to be, but it's really just hyperbole to say they're wrapped around google's finger.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I guess we just disagree what kind of influence having your company derive 90% of its income from a competitor can have.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Oh wow, I did that exact switch yesterday upon seeing the changes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm mainly trying to work out how to get off windows.

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Linux Mint. You'll get a thousand other recommendations which you can perhaps explore once you're more comfortable with Linux but for the easiest most Windows-like experience just get Mint.

You don't even need to ditch Windows completely, if you're uncomfortable with that, because you can dual boot meaning when you turn your PC on it asks would you like to open Windows or Linux

If you don't like it, well, at least you tried. I think you'll have a great time though exploring free software to do tasks you would have had to pay or subscribe to previously.

Take your time, ask questions on forums if you need to, and most importantly, enjoy it. Enjoy the experience of learning how computers actually work, enjoy personalising your machine to truly be your machine.

Good luck, and have fun!

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Nice. I've been there, and changing just a bit at a time has added up to my computing now being in a state I'm much happier with.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Librewolf. Mozilla will just keep enshittifying their browser. My biggest hope is that chrome is split off from Google and Mozilla loses their funding from google (500M/year). It's way more than they need and they refuse to actually compete with Chrome/Chromium. Instead, they are content being the excuse for Google not to be sued for being a monopoly.

Hopefully the charade will end before Trump leaves office. Either because the US courts force google to split or because the EU finally grows a pair and declares Google and their tech to be a liability. My bet is that a new browser like LadyBird will give Firefox a reason to actually improve, but it'll be too late.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

After a quick look at librewolf I may absolutely join you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Nope.

Not that I don't think it's a dumb move from Mozilla, but the options right now are:

  • Stay with Firefox
  • Move to a Firefox-based browser

Especially since I use Mozilla's services I'm sorta in their ecosystem right now. Maybe once I've moved passwords off I can consider moving, but even then on Android the only browser that supports uBlock is Firefox afaik, which makes it my YouTube client of choice.

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

100% recommend moving off firefox's password manager, as it's generally much more insecure than something like Bitwarden

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

a password manager is better.

[–] ReversalHatchery 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you don't need to move to a non-firefox based browser. Honestly what would you move to, chromium?

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean if Im on mozilla's code im on mozilla's code no matter what fork that is. Feels like decrying a policy in Arch Linux so you move to Manjaro.

Of course there's no real alternative engines either. Either Chromium where they're shuttering Manifest V2 or Webkit which is under Apple so until Ladybird is up there I'm not sure about migrating to a fork.

[–] ReversalHatchery 1 points 18 hours ago

Chromium has much worse issues. that engine never really had any advantages in privacy either, on the contrary: uBlock Origin (not lite) has a wiki page on its github repo that talks about some of chromium's disadvantages for addon capabilities, and that was written with Mv2 in mind.

and that's just the tip of the iceberg.

[–] ReversalHatchery 1 points 18 hours ago

also, the new ToS does not apply for the source code, so forks are relatively safe for now.

relatively, because librewolf is being kept alive by its automated build processes and relatively good maintainability, and what else is there other than the young forks like zen and floorp

https://beehaw.org/comment/4268300

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

No, because I haven't used mainline Firefox in years.
I'm pretty happy with LibreWolf on desktop and IronFox (available on Accrescent btw!) on Android (GrapheneOS)

Unfortunately it's still much less secure than Chromium, but I want and need a proper adblocker to maintain my freedom online. And I'm definitely not using Brave...

The only kinda usable Chromium browsers are Ungoogled Chromium and Trivalent. I think I might try building Trivalent on macOS at some point. Maybe also gonna apply some patches from Thorium, as long as they don't compromise security.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's still much less secure than Chromium

What does that mean?

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

I use Waterfox as my primary and Vivaldi as my secondary browser for when a site just really wants a Chromium based browser...it's great, Chrome minus Google, plus a few nice extras. For those old enough to remember when Opera was a popular alternative browser (before getting bought up and turned to garbage) -- Vivaldi is from the guy who made Opera.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Well it's proprietary and in my opinion extremely bloated.

[–] yozul 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Is there anything in the new ToS that's even bad? Like, there are lots of people breathlessly ranting about how privacy is dead because Mozilla mentioned the existence of third parties and gibberish like that, but when I read it myself it mostly seemed like they were just saying that if you use third party services through Firefox then the third parties will have your data. That seems kinda like a nothingburger of a controversy to me. I dunno, I'm not a lawyer, maybe I missed something, but if so I certainly haven't seen anybody else explain it properly.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They also recently removed the promise to never sell data: https://programming.dev/post/26136291

There's this comment (https://lemmy.zip/post/32886349/16923402) in this post (https://lemmy.zip/post/32886349?sort=Top) that should be interesting

You can't see it from Beehaw as beehaw defederated Lemmy.world

[–] yozul 7 points 3 days ago

They removed a broadly worded promise that might theoretically be used to get them in trouble for selling anonymized data. I'm not happy about that, but it doesn't surprise me.

The rest is just people being angry at Mozilla for describing how a modern web browser works, because other companies have pointed at similar language to argue that they have the right to do whatever they want with any information they collect and no one has stopped them. That sucks, but the problem is that there are no consequences for large corporations, not that Mozilla is using the information you put into your browser to access the internet for you. Maybe Mozilla will also decide to intentionally misinterpret their own legalese to train some garbage AI, but the absolute worst case scenario is that they're the same as every other significant browser, and a more reasonable interpretation would be that the non-profit organization is probably not profit motivated and actually means the things they say.

Who knows. I can't see the future, but without Firefox forks of it are a dead-end, and any other browser is still going to collect a bunch of information and use it to navigate the web for you, because that's just how today's garbage javascript laden websites work. Yelling at Mozilla for explaining that in their ToS isn't going to fix it, and Ladybird isn't going to magically change how those websites work. If you really want to do something about it, don't use those websites. Good luck with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fitik@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

Not yet, they're still the best option that doesn't use Chromium (I don't count Safari), but Servo is looking pretty promising

[–] e0qdk@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Yes.

Short term -- I'll probably be moving to LibreWolf, most likely. I'm planning to spend a good chunk of time this weekend reviewing what exactly their fork does. I've read their self-description already -- and like it -- but I want to look through the code and try to build it myself before I start depending on it.

Long term -- I'll be keeping my eye on Servo and Ladybird.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm staying on this side, but probably switching to a fork like Librewolf

I've previously used Floorp which is feature rich but not polished, and same goes for Zen

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I've heard that librewolf struggles to keep up to date with important security updates iirc? That is pretty much the only thing holding me from using it permanently.

Seeing a lot of people recommend the same three forks, though. I'll have to try them out and see what i like best :D

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I honestly have no clue, personally.

I know i have to jump ship, but my choices are either chromium, or a fork of firefox, that may be slow to catch up with security / may not last.

I've got my eyes on librewolf, floorp and zen.

I'm especially watching https://ladybird.org/. A completely independent browser. But the dev has gotten himself in hot water iirc, but anything to get away from google and mozilla, i guess. Also, it's not complete.

We'll see what the future has in stock for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ibuki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep. I've switched to Waterfox, but I need a browser for my phone(I run iOS, yes I know), any suggestions?

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brave is unfortunately still the best browser on iOS when it comes to privacy. I absolutely despise of the company and especially their homophobic CEO, but there aren't better alternatives available right now.

[–] ibuki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

That's very unfortunate :/

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

Coincidentally, I just found out about Floorp yesterday, in no relation to this ToS change, and will take a look at it soon. Keep in mind I haven't looked at all yet, so I have no clue if they have a worse ToS or something.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 4 points 3 days ago

Well, I have been using Zen, a Firefox fork for the past 6 months, and they have yet to clarify their stance on the ToS update.

Anyway, I don't think I'll change anyway, we need Gecko in the browser engine landscape and I have been so used to Firefox'S UI and flexibility that I have a hard time imagining myself not using a Firefox-based browser.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago

I'm going to stick to Firefox for the time being at least for the clients where I managed to get Firefox ESR accepted. For everything else, it might be the time to switch to Librewolf. Among other advantages, they have enabled jxl support.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've been inching towards Gnome Web (WebKit) for a while now. Every time I try using it I last a little longer than last time before I encounter some deal breaking issue and return to Firefox.

In the short term I'm considering sticking to Firefox for work, and using Gnome Web for all other kinds of distractions. I'm writing this in Gnome Web right now, and it's working great. :)

On mobile I'll probably stick to Firefox for a while. So they will still have all my data, and if I have to choose between Mozilla and Google it will still be Mozilla. But my god I wish they would stop acting like idiots.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

On PC, I will look into switching to a fork. Not sure what to do on my phone

load more comments
view more: next ›