this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

219 readers
93 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Can we stop sharing this guy's every word like he's an authority on everything? He's a blogger, not an expert on international relations.

[–] threesigma@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

First, he’s not alone. There was a globe and mail editorial that also boosted this idea, with an emphasis on drug and AI patents.

Second, he doesn’t claim expertise in trade relations; he’s an expert on the recent history of IP and reasonable claim in that.

But frankly, what expertise in international relations is appropriate? Trump is blowing shit up, and does not act like a rational actor. Can you name someone who IS an expert on how to handle this?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

The only new thing about this is that it's coming from the US. Irrational governments have and do exist in the real world and people have been dealing with them for centuries. Maybe look to them for answers instead of the random internet celebrity that has zero experience in the matter.

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A blogger and…

Dude has had some fairly prophetic understandings of how thing are headed for years, so he does have some background on a potentially valid pov.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, he's the "Internet prophet". That gives him credibility.

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 5 points 4 weeks ago

No, but it gives him a reason to be read and considered. Taking anyone’s ideas just because they said them is… problematic to say the least.

I am just trying to give you a bit more context than you seem willing to find, and, as everyone who has responded in this thread seems to note, you are writing responses that seem bizarrely … aggressive?

I mean, I’m not wed to the idea, nor am I to all the man’s writings, but you seem extremely set against him with no explanation.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

NAFTA 2 (and 1) is suspended until tariffs removed. NAFTA 2 (USMCA) did add some IP protections that NAFTA had mostly already. But simple response is no NAFTA rules apply to Canada if US declares fake national emergency to bypass USMCA. It's not "just" an act of war, it is "unilateral suspension of USMCA" to make war. Canada does not need a national emergency declaration to invalidate USMCA until pig fucker begs to get it back.

[–] HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Fighting dirty. I like it.

It's an intriguing idea to ignore American IPs, but then why would American businesses sell their products in Canada at all if IPs aren't being respected? It also sounds like Canadian consumers would be hindered in the long term because jailbreaking isn't performed by the majority of consumers (how many people currently use a VPN to bypass Netflix's region locks)

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

They might not. But then, most people aren't going to do things that violate the IP rights in the first place, so they'd be willingly giving up sales.

And they're welcome to do so.

Most of the decision makers for those businesses voted for this. Let them suffer for it. Forever, if possible.