this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1444 readers
8 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So, do any pirates here have a grasp in what this asshole feels towards piracy in general? Should we be worried? I'm worried he'll install an FCC that'll work against internet rights, that's one concern.

I'd like to hear what thoughts you have.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if it's not directly related to piracy, he will try to censor the internet in ways that will harm your possibilities of consuming pirated content.

Get a vpn. From a country that doesn't make part of the 14 eyes, with real no-logs policy and, if possible, that accepts cash, crypto or prepaid cards. Ditch windows too.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

PSA: all women in Trumpistan should be especially very mindful of state-level surveillance of their internet use, whether or not they pirate stuff. But this is also good advice for all pirates.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well he's going to make it nigh-impossible to afford electronic equipment or compute power.

Piracy may be fine, but the tools that facilitate it will be broken.

Get what you can now, and embrace the return to sneakernets.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I for one welcome the new piracy arms race, every time someone tries to stop piracy, piracy gets easier and more efficient.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

His deputy (Barr) said that criminal use of VPNs should be looked into but nothing became of that.

This happened like more than 4 years ago so I could be wrong. Someone correct me if I am

EDIT: He wanted all encryption to have backdoors

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/us-attorney-general-demands-encryption-backdoors-at-all-costs-and-for-you-to-just-accept-it/

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I doubt he knows what it is but at least one of his fascist collaborators probably do.

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 2 points 6 days ago

the last 16 years had 4 years of republican rule. the democrats are very responsible for the fact that the feds are going after pirates (crime against rich stakeholders) instead of crimes against the members of the general American demographic as a principle.

the change from public servants to corporate military is a bipartisan problem, folks

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

He'll do whatever makes his buddies the most money.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He is not going to appoint someone to the FCC. He is going to get rid of it. ISPs are going to be free to do whatever they want with no federal interference.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago

He's not going to "get rid of it", he's going to corrupt it. Give spectrum to the biggest donors, reverse net neutrality, get rid of antitrust, revoke broadcast licenses of anyone who criticizes him.

[–] Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Which might be a blessing in disguise? I mean, for the ISPs that have been actively fighting corporate interests from telling them what to do. With no governmental branch telling them what to do and not wanting to lose many subscribers lest they risk going out of business, then isn't that a net positive?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

With no government oversight, and the nation already cut up into segments by the ISPs so that they have monopolies in their areas, you think the free market is suddenly going to start working like Ancaps say it will and regulate itself in a way that’s good for consumers?

If you’re the kind of person to believe something like that, then I have a new cryptocurrency you should buy from me. Guaranteed to go to the moon, no rug pull. Trust me, bro.

Facebook is now $5.00 a month charge

Steam access is $20.00 charge

Countries without net Neutrality are like this. If I believe correctly Belgium is like this.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That also means people can do whatever they want with spectrum. Gonna fuck with Starlink and all kinds of other communications. Afterall, with no FCC, y'all can do whatever you want.

[–] flork@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago

This won't happen, what will happen is that he revokes the broadcast license of anyone who criticizes the administration and removes all consumer protections against privacy and surveillance. he will repeal section 230 for everyone except X and Truth social.

[–] S13Ni@lemmy.studio 1 points 1 week ago

Probably not too much so his big tech friends can scrape all data they need.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Everything will be fine unless someone shows him an active torrent of The Apprentice and explains he doesn’t get paid residuals if people watch it that way.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

oh yeah, it's all gone, he's for the oligarch media owners, expect pirate sites to be nuked across the board, expect internet access to be 10x more expensive, expect vpn's to be curtailed if not outlawed outright. it's the end of all things. this is no hyperbole.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Eh, not necessarily. Hollywood hates piracy and Trump hates Hollywood, it might actually be as simple as that.