this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
421 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

235 readers
41 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sharks are older than trees.

They're older than a lot of things. Land plants, Yellowstone, appendages,dinosaurs, doritos.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sharks are older than trees.

But are younger than the mountains.

[–] Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 8 points 1 month ago

The geologic processes that led to the formation of the Appalachian Mountains started 1.1 billion years ago.

There's no shark without Mountain Mama

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Why did I read this to the tune of colors of the wind…

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Some of it.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe any animal is older than doritos

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 4 points 1 month ago

No they are wrong. Doritos are eternal.

[–] falsemirror 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately (or fortunately?) this appears to be untrue.

Polaris is a cluster of stars formed about 2 billion years ago. Sharks originated about 450 million years ago.

One star of Polaris (Aa) appears to be 50 million years old, but it seems likely due to a collision of stars which added mass to it.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it's technically not wrong.

[–] WrenMala8@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And yet, technically wrong

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

Schrödinger's fact.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

But polaris Aa is the only visible star with naked eye. So that can be called formation of star?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

this blows my mind

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I hate it