UK Nature and Environment

5 readers

1 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

GreyShuck@feddit.uk

Kim@feddit.uk

Thames Water may never pay £104m fine as Ofwat leaves door open for talks (inews.co.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thames Water may avoid paying a £104m fine for historic sewage spills as the regulator Ofwat is leaving the door open to negotiation with the firm, i understands.

Ofwat has handed out fines totalling £168m to three English water companies as part of its ongoing investigation into persistent sewage dumping and environmental pollution.

Thames Water has been handed out the largest fine (£104m), followed by Yorkshire Water (£47m) and Northumbrian Water (£17m).

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 8 points 3 months ago

After a brief roar, OFWAT lets out a little mew and rolls over to have its tummy ticked by corporate interests.

[–] Streamwave@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they're pretty much about to go under - do they even have the £104m to pay?

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does that matter? If you've only got £100 to your name and you break the law, the courts don't normally give a toss. You still have to pay lawyer fees and fines even if it means you go into debt.

Why should a for-profit company be treated any differently?

It might even be the catalyst to bring them back into national ownership and be rid of the root problem that made them break the law in the first place.

[–] Streamwave@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well sure, but then is the British government on the hook for the debt that the investors are going to be calling in?

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

No.