this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
407 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
48 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] amio@kbin.social 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well at least this surely will be easily disabled and then not keep re-enabling itself when Windows forgets its own settings every couple weeks(!)

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 months ago

It won't on... wait for it... Linux!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s a cool idea in principle. I just don’t trust the company with my data even if they claim it is stored locally, but then again that’s why I don’t use their OS.

[–] rumschlumpel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'd totally use whatever FOSS equivalent eventually makes it to the Linux desktop once it's actually usable.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 5 months ago

It might not be long if the idea works. We already have good local LLMs.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even if this data wasn’t stolen by Microsoft (it will be) and sold to every advertiser everywhere (it WILL BE)

Having screenshots taken of your PC every few seconds and then stored on your hard drive is going to nuke your storage in a matter of days, maybe weeks at the most

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

According to available information that I've come across, everything is processed on-device and encrypted and 25gb can store months of rewind data depending on how much and how you use your device. At that rate, a terabyte should store about a decade of history (I can't think of anything you would need to go that far back for though).

If security researchers don't find sussy behavior where Recall sends back some sort of data beyond basic telemetry, there's not really any higher of a privacy risk compared to using your computer as you currently do. Also you can disable it for certain applications and delete history when you want to (or disable the feature altogether). People are being really weird about this for reasons that have already been addressed.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 5 months ago

Here’s the issue, though. It’s a corporation saying they pinky promise not to steal even more of your data, and I don’t trust them any more than I can purchase their company

That is to say, not even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a thousandth of a percent

[–] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

Now introducing Microsoft dildonics. We will tell you when to put it in your holes.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

For somebody who's last windows experience was windows 7: what did they come up now again?

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

I don't expect MS will give you the choice. Not as far as the whole spying on you part is concerned, at least.

[–] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

I predict GNUL desktop at 5%

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago

I'll use it at work because I don't give a fuck about that machine but not for my personal machine.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 5 points 5 months ago

Say the L word instead