this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

107 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 77 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Can't afford a home, probably gonna be illegal to be homeless. Guess they should just kill themselves then.

Fuck the modern conservative movement. No empathy for the downtrodden.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 9 points 10 months ago

The next step is blending them into a nutrient-rich slush that will be fed to people in workhouses

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think this is just about conservatives, it's also about the owner class and their quality of life. But def significant overlap.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/us-homeless-encampments-companies-profiting-sweeps

Revealed: how companies made $100m clearing California homeless camps Public spending on private sweep contractors is soaring across the state – and unhoused people allege poor treatment

This reminds of the gross, despicable private detention and private prison industry in America.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

these ghouls need to see some consequences. fucking libs.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As if we don't know how this Court will decide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a great idea.

Of course, if it's a crime to be homeless, it's also a crime to force or coerce someone into commiting that crime.

I look forward to the officials and landlords responsible to be jailed for each crime they helped commit.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

"No, not like that!"

[–] LoamImprovement 20 points 10 months ago

How's that old quote go again? "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 months ago

That's right homeless, you can't sleep here. Just go home already.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 13 points 10 months ago

"Let them sleep inside". paraphrasing Marie Antoinette. smh.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

So, they won't help them and won't let them be on the streets? Man, homeless folks need to learn to levitate then, so they can sleep in the air instead.

[–] DaSaw@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This seems like a no-brainer to me... though it probably isn't. Obviously you have a constitutional right to sleep, wherever you can make space for yourself. If these cities and downs don't want people sleeping outside, they need to provide indoor space for people who haven't actually committed crimes. We treat our criminals better than we treat our homeless.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

fuck their laws, I think, is the ruling here. just fuck them completely. we do not have a society. your conscience is the only guide.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

This is probably the most prescient episode of Star Trek ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_Tense_(Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine)

Basically Sisko and friends go back in time to America in 2024, where it's illegal to be homeless and they get put in an open air prison.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's not "sleeping outdoors" that is at issue here, it's the long term encampments in public spaces and how to deal with them.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Given these people have nowhere to go why not set aside some public land that allows long term encampments or maybe if it’s a concern about the safety of these encampments, the government could acquire an empty office building and retrofit it with modest accommodations for these peoples.

Or you could just admit it’s not about helping these people it’s about making them go away.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago

Those are both reasonable solutions and I'm not arguing against them. I just pointed out that this fight isn't about banning homeless people from sleeping outside. It's more nuanced than that.