this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
11 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a mystery this is.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Corporate taxes used to cover over 30% of government revenue, it's 10% now. The top marginal income tax rate peaked in the 1960s at somewhere around 80% on income exceeding ~3M/year (today's money). We've had 4 decades of tax cuts while the cost of delivering services has increased more or less with the inflation rate. Private equity funds now have favourable tax treatment, and stock buybacks, previously considered illegal stock manipulation is a common practice. And so on and so forth.

If you want what you had, you have to do what you did.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm inclined to suspect the corporate taxes covering 30 percent down to ten, is more related to an increase in government spending and increasing individual's taxes, than cutting corporate, because, believe it or not, they tax the living shit out of businesses, much more and it'll start to cause failures. Often times businesses that would be quite profitable just on the other side of the border, are barely making it despite comparable sales, and taxes go up tomorrow,

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago (5 children)

they tax the living shit out of businesses

Yeah. It's how we spend on keeping Canadians healthy and happy like every other happy country does. Keep up.

And TEN IS LESS THAN THIRTY like it was in the Good Old days we seemed to survive before, in those years when we built things like bridges and railways (those are the rotting, unmaintained things we non-helicopter-owning wage-slaves use) like Sweden and Denmark do to this day.

increase in government spending

TAX AND SPEND. Keep up. It's a whole thing.

quite profitable just on the other side of the border

Unless you mean on Miquelon or Greenland, you must be talking about the border to that user-pays, fuck-the-plebes, birth-slavery, medical-bankruptcy hell to our south.

Having lived there, I fervently hope you aren't holding that nearly-fascist mess as a goal. Alberta is cruel enough for us; let's not go full American.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago

Ooh, I know this! Is it capitalism?

It's capitalism.

[–] a9249@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Conservative provincial policy happened.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

jesus christ why not just say "But Harper" outright? At least when the conservatives are in charge, they try fix everything the Liberals broke. But they break shit so bad, it's hard to come back. We'll be feeling this Trudeau for 50 years, and we still haven't recovered from his dad.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 months ago

The biggest things that happened are media hubris and corporate consolidation. Secondary things are population increase and offshore investment.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

Holy shit, when fucking Bloomberg says that neoliberalism is the problem, you know it's bad.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But spending cuts in the 1980s and 1990s, along with a move to put more responsibility for economic and social well-being on the shoulders of individuals, caused low-income Canadians to fall further behind, the report says.

So neoliberalism. Neoliberalism happened.

Who could've guessed.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's amazing reading some of these statements. Spending increased every year but cuts are the problem holding people back, when taxes have increased dramatically since then too.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Taxes don't tend to affect you when you make less than the tax cutoff.

But not having the social services those taxes used to fund suddenly means you don't get to eat dinner tomorrow, or you can't go to a family doctor because there aren't any available.

People like to complain about taxes, but taxes never made someone destitute.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The people in this country who make less than the tax cutoff are so few it doesn't even come into a discussion between actual adults on general policy. You clowns would impoverish everyone on the lie that that is what it takes to give a very few welfare.

"but taxes never made someone destitute." that there is what we call a "lie".

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

Taxes alone will not make you destitute. Paying extra for privatized services which should be public, will make you destitute.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

when taxes have increased dramatically since then too

No they haven't:

https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/have-taxes-changed-all-much-over-past-half-century

In 1961, families paid 33.5% of their income on taxes, but by 1969 they were paying 39% and in 1974 they paid 43.4% of their income. So, if you compare the 2009 effective family tax rate to 1961, you will find a 25% increase, but you will only report a 7% increase since 1969 and an actual decrease since 1974.

(Note this analysis is circa 2010, but things haven't changed substantially since then aside from the post COVID inflation spike that's still subsiding).

But enjoy the alternate reality brought to you by your "friends" at the Fraser Instituteℒ️.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

What happened is neoliberalism.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Our southern neighbour has a huge lobbying campaign to turn our system in a private health care system.

It's not that they are actively working towards this that is the problem .... it's equally problematic that we citizens are more than willing to just wander around like zombies and let it all happen.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

The most effective lobbying campaign has been being exposed to our system. I am so sick of this fucking tim hortons patriotism bs