this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
31 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thx in advice.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alexdeathway@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

More specifically, Linux Mint Debian Edition. Canonical has been very weird, I would get the debian based branch

https://www.linuxmint.com/download_lmde.php

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

My vote is Linux Mint. I had installed it on a family members laptop and have been going strong for years without fault.

[–] Gueggel@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Ubuntu or Linux Mint

[–] TheDarkBanana87 2 points 8 months ago

You could give fedora a try

[–] ClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Don't know which one to recommend but I would never recommend Ubuntu. It is full of bugs to me. I used it for years without issues but now it is impossible for me. Installed it on my girlfriend's laptop recently and she has the same bugs I had years ago when I dropped it : network disconnects randomly and she has to reboot, bluetooth won't reconnect sometimes... I can help but it is definitely not working out of the box for users who are not into tech.

[–] strawberry@kbin.run 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

just installed bazzite and after switching to x11 (one button thing) its the first district to have no screen tearing, no stutter

though this is a very gaming focused district, so maybe not for you

its derived from universal blue so maybe check that out

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 months ago

And a non-gaming focused equivalent would be Bluefin.

[–] unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

openSUSE Tumbleweed is pretty comfy. Btrfs snapshots enabled by default so it's really hard to break it. I've been using it for about 8 months now and haven't had any big issues.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Tumbleweed? No way dude. That's a rolling release.

[–] unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Rolling but feels very stable. Packages go through a testing phase before release to make sure they work properly. I really like getting all the newest updates and features.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And for being one it's shockingly stable. It's in a bit of flux right now as things are between X11/Wayland, but it's definitely not as iffy as bleeding-edge Arch or anything. :)

[–] unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah I'm on X11 for now, waiting on nvidia to be ready before trying wayland again. AMD users should be fine to use wayland though.

[–] hojjat@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I've got PopOs on my personal (framework) and work (System76) laptop. It's been super stable. Specially if you don't mess around with different PPAs.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago

Pop_OS or Linux Mint. Both just work. The Atomic idea is nice, but still too soon for complete beginners or the lazy (not a pejorative).

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fedora oddly doesn’t ship LTS kernels if you are looking for more stability

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They test and maintain their own kernel tree instead. I find this advantageous for Workstation use which tends to be on newer hardware than servers.

Despite this Fedora is the furthest distro from unstable that I have experienced, which is why I recommend it as a "no frills" option.

I would not recommend Fedora or Pop for servers.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Mint, it just works.

[–] t0mri@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a long time Arch user but it is 100% NOT out of the box. Love Arch but it's not the answer to this question.

[–] t0mri@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mentioned it as a joke. But come to think of it, why can't it be, except for the fact that each update can potentially break your machine? I mean, just install GNOME, and you'll have the "all out of the box experience," isn't that so? Well, I don't consider myself an experienced Linux user, so please enlighten me if I'm wrong

Edit: i understood the question. Hes asking fedora

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

What do you want to do with it?

This request is impossible to fulfill

  • people that dont care about wayland etc. may use Linux Mint
  • people that want a server will choose Debian
  • people dont care about malware will choose ubuntu
  • people that dont care about all of that will use an Atomic Fedora Spin like Silverblue
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

I'd correct the spelling, remove the lazy initialism, fix the comma splice and the which/that error.

You want to give people a reason to stop and help you. Be better, okay?

[–] edifier@feddit.it 0 points 8 months ago

For me it is Fedora

[–] bismuthbob@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What are you trying to build? A work laptop that you're going to take on trips, a gaming computer, a server? Something else?

For you, what is too much hassle? Are you a new Linux user or an experienced user with no spare time? What are you accustomed to doing when you install an operating system and what do you expect to be preinstalled?

What is your favorite colour?

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Experienced Linux user, but I was just wondering what people think about this, I believe I'm going for Ubuntu, I'm not exactly the kind of guy who will fall on malware anyway, I need something pretty easy to use, configure and working stable WO errors, as my experience I'm tired and have no time to fix shitty OS things.

I will use it as desktop in a NucBox.

[–] bismuthbob@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Ubuntu isn't my favorite, but I used xubuntu for many years. A lot of noise gets thrown around about Snaps, but from an end-user perspective they tend to work fine unless you have very low system constraints. Better than adding a half-dozen repositories that may or may not be around for long. A lot of developers work to make sure that their software runs well in Ubuntu and the LTS releases tend to be a good long-term option if you don't want any significant changes for a long time.

Even with their regular releases, I daisy-chained upgrades on an old Core2 laptop for something like seven years without any major (computer becomes a paperweight) issues. Sometimes (like with Snaps) Ubuntu insists on going its own way, which can result in errors/shitty OS things that don't pop up in other distributions. I've had to deal with some minor issues with Ubuntu over the years (broken repositories, upgrades causing hiccups, falling back to older kernels temporarily), but I think that you'll get issues like that regardless of what distro you pick.