this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
468 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1444 readers
45 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 195 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Weird, Netflix used to compete with piracy so well that many people stopped pirating altogether, by offering a more convenient service at a reasonable price that was hard for even the most stubborn of pirates to refuse and resulted in a massive boom for its own industry. I wonder what could have changed that caused the people to leave Netflix and return to piracy. Hmm. I wonder.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 9 months ago

Everyone decided they wanted to have their own streaming and wanted a bigger piece of the pie. That fragmented where to watch and caused old shows and movies to cost way more for streaming rights.

Then Netflix cancels too many originals without proper endings, which passes people off. After that they got rid of password sharing which made it a pain to have a work and home type of viewing experience. Now they're adding ads. They've become shit and now it's making it a bit harder for themselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 155 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No - piracy, since it always carries at least some amount of difficulty and risk, is easy to compete against. And in fact, paid services, including Netflix, have proven that over and over. All it takes is to offer dependable convenience and quality and to treat customers well. People are always willing to pay a reasonable price for that.

The problem is that piracy becomes difficult to compete against when, as Netflix is currently doing, you shift from a business model of providing good service under fair terms for a reasonable price to a business model of providing crappy service under onerous terms for too much money, because the greedy, selfish, short-sighted sacks of shit at the top want to make even more obscene amounts of money. That's the point at which piracy gains enough of an advantage to outweigh its difficulties and risks.

And when that's the case, it's pretty obvious what the real problem is.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 27 points 9 months ago

The trick is to make as much money as possible then jump ship to a newer competing company that has the ability to grow more before you leech it to death again

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 151 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've never seen a magnet link respond with "this is not available in your country".

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago (12 children)

They won't even let you watch stuff like anime with subtitles if it's not dubbed in your language. Like why?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 87 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Piracy isn't even free! People pay thousands of dollars for hardware, and hundreds per year for electricity and various service providers.

But they actually get what they want for that money: Being able to watch whatever you want, anytime, on any device, in high quality and without ads. It must be really hard for streaming services to compete with features as futuristic as that!

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 41 points 9 months ago

Seriously. I'm running a Synology with 12x16TB. That'd buy a bunch of months of streaming services...but this way actually gives me content to watch that I want to watch.

[–] QualifiedKitten@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think many people may view those sort of costs differently than the monthly subscription costs of Netflix, etc. Hardware is generally seen as a "one time" cost, and the added electricity costs are difficult to tease out from all the other variable electricity costs.
My personal argument is that I pay a monthly subscription ($15/mo) for a seed box, which is roughly the same cost as subscribing to a single streaming service.
Back before the password sharing crackdown, I had access to my parents' Netflix account, and every once in a while, I'd try it out, but I'd always quickly get annoyed and would finish watching whatever I was watching via my Plex server.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] belated_frog_pants 78 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"Lets make 50 competing services while people have less buying power than ever. Everything will be $15 if you want anything of value. P.s. the thing you wanted leaves next month HURRY"

Cant imagine why people pirate /s

[–] EmptyRadar@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yep, there was a time when streaming services actually became easier than piracy. That was when there was basically just Netflix and Hulu. If you had both of those, you had everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flathead@lemm.ee 65 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Operating Revenue: 33,723,297,000

Cost of Revenue: 19,715,368,000

Gross Profit: 14,007,929,000

Operating Expense: 7,053,926,000

Operating Income: 6,954,003,000

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Our profits may be obscene, but they're not obscene enough! How could these evil pirates ever do this to us?"

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The constant growth aspect of capitalism means that profits are never obscene enough for any business.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 63 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Infinitely reproducible digital media has little inherent value. As the article acknowledges, the value proposition Netflix offered was convenience. If pirate sites offer more convenience than Netflix offers legitimate users, Netflix will lose. I find it baffling they are fucking around with ads and locking down access, making their experience worse. Same with Amazon Prime. It's like they forgot their own business model.

[–] Fluid@aussie.zone 29 points 9 months ago

Exactly. Steam figured this out early on and it's how they have maintained their dominance in the game distribution business. It's the same lessons the entertainment streaming platforms must learn - your value is convenience. Add more walls between consumers and content? you will be cast aside.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 62 points 9 months ago

Cry less, make better service more.

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 60 points 9 months ago (8 children)

"Piracy is Difficult to Compete Against"

Have you tried

Not Enshittifying

?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"We successfully competed against piracy and drove it to near-extinction, but now that we're enshittified we can't compete with piracy while continuing to make the obscene amounts of money that we want to make"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi 50 points 9 months ago

Press releases like this are corporate signaling to US Congress that they would like some lawfare and are willing to pay for it.

Pirate streaming growth itself doesn't 'threaten legal services' as TF suggests. Any threat that arises is created by industry's market response. It comes back to margins. Netflix could decide overnight to invest in a long-term 'hearts and minds' approach that includes a quality platform user experience free of hostile design, non-discrimination amongst devices, relaxed household access rules, attentive customer service, commitment to finishing programming properly, improved stream quality, etc. Becoming the Valve of streaming represents an expenditure increase, though. You're now a lower margin business with a very sticky and content customer base. That's not a story industry wants to tell its investors, knowing they will respond with 'you should be petitioning for bills that enable more market captivity'.

They do the right thing only as a last resort, because the right thing is expensive.

[–] 0xtero 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Once, not so long ago, streaming was more convenient than pirating. But, as expected the commercial services went through their Standard Cycle of Enshittification and now we either let ourselves get flogged by 50 competing predatory services or just take the easy way and sail the high seas.

The choice is not that hard. Yarr.

Of course this returns us to the state where the streaming companies who have literally "enshitted their own beds" now turn to legislators and policymakers (who they hated, just couple of weeks ago) to ask them to provide some "law and order" to this unruly mob and to defend the corporations right to put thumbscrews on the population for ever increasing profits.

And so it goes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Piracy is really easy to compete against. Ask GabeN. Steam has singlehandedly taken me out of the piracy game because they have what I want, it's super easy to get and if it's not reasonably priced today I'll wishlist it until it goes on sale (and it will). If it sucks, or my hardware can't run it, I just dm someone and I get my money back. I know they can disappear shit from my library like any online store but they haven't abused that privilege with me yet and that makes me confident they won't.

With Netflix, there's a small chance that they actually have what I want. If they do, it's gonna disappear soon. Prices only ever go up, not down, and that series you love is gonna be cancelled as soon as it stops driving new subscriptions. To watch everything I want I can spend a hundred dollars a month on a rotating set of accounts on several streaming services or I can go LOOK for the MOVIE 2 stream for free without even messing with a DOT TOrrent file.

Piracy is easy to prevent if you provide a better service than the pirates. What he meant was that it's hard to get people to pay you to shit in their mouths when someone else is giving out sandwiches.

[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

in fact for the games that have been removed I actually still have full access, like rocket League still in my library just not purchasable anymore

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also Netflix: We should raise our prices again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 47 points 9 months ago

Yeah back in the golden era of streaming you only needed Netflix, most of the shows on there were good, and everything would eventually be on there. So piracy was too much of pain in the ass to bother with to save $10 a month.

Now there's 10 different streaming services most of them cost a lot more than $10 per month, you have to wade through pages of crap to find anything worth watching. If you hear about a show or movie that sounds interesting you can't just wait for it to show up on Netflix. You have to go and search for which streaming service has the show you want and there's a good likelihood you're not subscribed to that one.

It's now far easier to search on the 'bay for what you want to see (you have to do a search anyway) and they always have it. Yeah I guess you're not instantly watching it, but you're not instantly watching a thing you want to see on a streaming service now anyway, because have to scroll past a wall of crap to find anything.

My general feeling on piracy is that when you're young and don't have much money, you can't afford to pay for it anyway, you may as well pirate it. When you get older and can afford it then you should pay for movies and video games and stuff. But when they make it more of a pain in the ass to buy something than it is to pirate things, then I dunno what to say. I have money and want to pay for a service that I can just chill and watch cool stuff, but they seem more interested in various schemes to impress shareholders than providing me the thing I'm willing to pay for.

[–] DevilOfDoom@lemmy.one 45 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As Lord Gaben once said: Piracy is a service problem.

Make better service, have less piracy.

[–] legoraft@reddthat.com 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Spotify is a good example of this imo, I can listen everything, so it's not necessary to pirate music. I do have some issues, but never had the problem of not being able to listen what I want

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

2013 Netflix competed just fine. Piracy was mostly dead back then

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

But 2013 Netflix didn't have to compete with Prime Video, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, HBO Max, Apple TV, Hulu, Peacock, or any of the million "add-on" channels that Amazon uses as an excuse to paywall you off from the content.

The fact that they all run in their own UI, desperate the shove the next instalment of mediocrity down your throat, means that I've gone back to piracy. It's just much easier to type what I'm after into Radarr or Sonarr than it is to go through the services to see what's available. Sure, I can use Justwatch, but 80% of the time what I'm after isn't on anything I have.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Netflix Buddy, friend, matey. If I have to pop open Google to find where I can watch something, find the best offers on pricing, and how to circumvent ads or whatever, or how to get Netflix to run on my devices without installing invasive crap or derooting my phone etc, and it's actually quite expensive.

I'll just do one search and not worry about whether I'll have to fight ads, or automatic iffy quality settings, weird compression algorithms, device compatibility etc.

I was happy to hang up the peg leg when I could just VPN to usa and watch everything for the price of a lunch a month. I like simplicity, I enjoyed your more arty shows. It was you who changed the deal Netflix, not I. you decided being insanely profitable wasn't enough and you needed infinite growth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 35 points 9 months ago

Piracy predates Netflix, if it was hard to fight against then Netflix as we know it wouldn’t have taken off

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They didn't seem to have any problems before they started fucking around with their pricing and policies and everyone else also started their own streaming services, splitting everything across multiple subscriptions instead of 1, convenient service.

I could keep up with what's available where and shuffle my subscriptions around every few months to see what I want when it's new... But it's way easier to just use a torrent site now.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 27 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Netflix already defeated piracy by producing endless mid “content” like The Grey Man that you can’t even be bothered to watch for free.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 27 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Netflix literally will not take my money anymore. I had cancelled my subscription during covid because money was tight, but I was willing to temporarily re-subscribe when the next season of select shows came out. I tried to re-enable my original account, but I couldn't because they wouldn't accept my credit card. I tried different cards, then tried to make new accounts with different emails and different credit cards, but still couldn't. Netflix kept rejecting all my cards. I ran out of credit cards.

Look, I was willing to give Netflix my money, it's not my fault they were unwilling to take it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was rather happy with Netflix for nearly a decade. The price was reasonable and family members could also watch. When I moved out I upgraded to the 4K package (split 3 ways between family members) and it was fine at first.

But there were several caveats:

  • 4K only works on TVs, on my 1440p monitor I could only watch 1080p. Sucked, but it's not too bad
  • Price kept going up, in the end it was 18€ a month. That's okay split between 3 people, but otherwise far too much for what is offered
  • Series that I liked kept getting cancelled, while trash was getting renewed or they messed up the later seasons (Looking at you, The Witcher..)
  • They cracked down on password sharing, suddenly you need to be in the same WiFi to count as home or you need a travel code (limited to 2 a month and only for 2 weeks each), so if you regularly move between places it's a no-go for a service you pay for

I finally cancelled it, sick of their shit. Which also has the benefit of no longer having to take care of the account for the family. Unfortunately my dad accidentally took over the account (while trying to create a new one) and keeps paying the 4K price (I suggested at least going down to 1080p as the quality is shit either way). Simply idiotic :-/

Personally I tried out Real Debrid and it has been pretty alright so far. The quality is better too, which is ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 26 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Solution: create a common platform for all online services (Netflix, Paramount, Disney, Warner, ...) and have EVERYTHING there, even old movies and not often seen ones.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And you know what would be good? Your subscription money will be divided equally between everything you watched that month.

If they want your money, they better make high quality show that's actually interesting.

Let them fight each other for our subscription money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] venji10@feddit.de 14 points 9 months ago

And also remove Digital Restrictions Management (DRM)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rengoku@social.venith.net 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Steam has never tried to battle piracy head on, yet it succeeds. Please take note, Netflix, it is your card to lose.

[–] silverhand@reddthat.com 17 points 9 months ago

This will only remain as long as Valve's original leadership (and Lord Gaben) stays in place. Once the MBAs start taking over it will go to shit fast.

Ironic that I'm saying this, since I am an MBA myself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EvangelicalSatanist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Netflix blaming piracy is just a warning that hostile legislation will pass and all of this will be shut down. Call me pessimistic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 9 months ago

Says the guys that reduced piracy to a fraction of its former self before getting too greedy. Piracy wasn't affecting them, but it's a side effect of what they have become.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 20 points 9 months ago

CEOs: *Do a greedflation, raking in historic profits.*

Also CEOs: "Why does no one want to pay for a subscription?"

[–] Unabart@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s not like cable was going to vanish and leave us with this wonderful ad-free Ala carte service we've always wanted. They dangled the bait and once everyone bit they set the hook and reeled in the suckers with an even worse, and costlier, scenario. In every avenue of entertainment, marketing is there to make sure it fucking sucks. Even some of the pirate apps have ads in them. Greed ruins everything and will be remembered as the true folly of man.

Set sail mofos! 🏴‍☠️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 9 months ago

dear netflix: may i interest you in the concept of not raising prices every year, not cancelling every queer show you put out, and not catering to transphobic bigot comedians?

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago

Hey Netflix, you need to compete on price AND the service offering. Make piracy feel inconvenient compared to paying and subscribing and you'll retain the userbase that is willing to pay. You'll never get those who aren't willing to pay no matter what.

[–] pizzahoe@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As long as Netflix doesn't do 1080p on Firefox and reduces their price considerably and gets rid of stupid limitations on account sharing and ads, I'm never paying for it. Same for games with DRM. I'm not suffering from DRM bs when I can pirate the same without DRM. Why should i pay these asshole companies more and be more restricted than a pirate lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›