Someone find the article of the Economist glorifying Britain's genocide in India from a back in the day. It seems like little has changed.

This article is a joke. The Economist is a joke. The OP's entire history is a joke.

It's amazing that the narrative has shifted to "you can't just call deliberately inflicting on a group of people conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part 'genocide'... shame on you!".

The ICJ will make a mockery of itself by the time this is all over, because even if it finds Isn’treal guilty years from now when the trail finally concludes, the US will veto any action at the Security Council.

Citations Needed podcast: News Brief: The ICJ Ruling and the Essentialness of Squishy Western Liberal Support for Genocide

In this public News Brief, we react to the media spin around the ICJ's genocide ruling against Israel and how framing by the NYT and BBC seeks to uphold the logic of the so called "war" creating said genocide.