this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
580 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
8 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can't believe so many of you are upvoting a post about murdering homeless people. You monsters!

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 10 months ago

Would have been a better joke without the "all". Then the meaning is ambiguous.

[–] BachenBenno@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago

Power to the people ☭

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I haven't read up on official human rights. Who made them? Did someone bother to ask most humans?

This is a Sunday-morning coffee post, not a detailed world-view. Feel free to ask, but refrain from shooting things down. It's not like I've spent hours on this.

How are they defined, human rights? I'd say anyone in my way to spread my genes keeps me from being a human.

As a pragmatist, I'd say breathing and eating, and perhaps warmth and caring are human rights. We can't do any of them on our own after being born, and without them some really crappy humans emerge. Breathing should be top tier. Anyone disturbing that should be under heavy focus. Can't do anything without air.

After that, once we are fairly independent, doing things to keep people keeping me from growing up and procreating should be my right.

Killing someone else would keep them from doing that, so not being killed by other humans seems like one. Killing others would disqualify me from being human, and I would give up my rights by that act. Straightforward stuff.

Mix in social structures, and it becomes complicated.

Being homeless? Build a commune somewhere. Why insist on being near that techno-tribe with internet. It's nothing but a tribe, has nothing to do with survival or being human. Having modern amenities can't be a right. Other humans invented them at some point.

Which leads to something no human should have a right to: owning land. Because owning land keeps humans from realizing their purpose and keeps them from being free to be human.

Housing is a right? That's ridiculous. That's a technological achievement from other people. So is monetary wealth. How can those be a right. If nobody came along inventing them, nobody would have them. Can't be a right. At all. That is just the consequences of capitalism and ownership of natural resources.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let me spell it out for you bub, i want to: Abolish Private Property

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You do? I wonder how that would work. Can't see it, personally.

[–] rando895@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Probably important to point this out: private property is not personal property.

E.g. An apartment building rented to tenants is the landlords private property. They have exclusive rights to the decisions, especially economic ones, regarding the building and the profits of the rent.

A car, book, house, pizza, are all your personal property so long as you don't owe a lender anything for them.

So no private property might look like:

The people who live in an apartment building own the building collectively and have the full right therein, but the individual units are each their own personal property.

[–] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago