Remember when COVID lockdowns happened and Republicans said it was the first step towards Democrats making interstate travel illegal?
They were just concerned their playbook was being copied.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
138 readers
3 users here now
@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
founded 2 years ago
It's always projection with the fascist GOP.
That sounds like a challenge to Congress' authority over interstate commerce.
Meatball Ron is like 0 & 12 in Federal courts. There should be a federal three strikes law on signing unconstitutional bills into law.
It's long been a cornerstone of my political daydreams that federal charges should be filed, as a matter of course, against any lawmakers who vote for legislation later ruled unConstitutional.
It should be illegal to pass or sign a bill you know is illegal or unconstitutional. But... Then we'd have to prove Republicans actually know the constitution.
Full Faith and Credit? Never heard of that…
These are the out-of-state license classes included in the list:
-
Connecticut licenses with the disclaimer "Not For Federal Identification." -
Delaware licenses that say "Driving Privilege Only" and "Not Valid for Identification." -
Hawaii licenses that read "Limited Purpose Driver's License," "Limited Purpose Instruction Permit," "Limited Purpose Provisional Driver's License," and "Not Valid for use for official Federal purposes." -
Rhode Island licenses with the disclaimers "Not for Federal Identification," "Driver Privilege Card," and "Driver Privilege Permit." -
Vermont licenses that say "Not for REAL ID Purposes Driver’s Privilege Card," "Not for REAL ID Purposes Junior Driver’s Privilege Card," and "Not for REAL ID Purposes Learner’s Privilege Card."
So what's happening is that drivers' licenses which clearly say they're not recognized as ID won't be recognized as an ID? I'm not seeing an issue, then.
REAL ID is a federal requirement to use a driver's license as a form of ID to fly within the US without a passport. They are still legally acceptable forms of ID for all other purposes. They are legal drivers licenses. You still have to prove your identity to acquire them.
FHP: "Papers, please..."
Lmao, meanwhile Massachusetts up here just straight giving undocumented immigrants full driver's licenses. Good luck with that one, Rhonda!
view more: next ›