this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Music

7305 readers
1 users here now

Discussion about all things music, music production, and the music industry. Your own music is also acceptable here.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Misleading title. He didn't say no.

He's actually being surprisingly open minded. The article is worth a read.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Okay, updated the title's disclaimer a bit. It seems that the Rhoads' leftover material is so low quality compared to that of John Lennon's that a new song couldn't be reconstructed similarly using AI.

[–] UNIX84 4 points 11 months ago

I didn't understand why Dee Rhoads was so protective of Randy's legacy for the 30+ years after his death until she passed away. Limiting access, very few interviews, no releases based on his demo/rehearsal tapes. As a fan (of Randy, not really Ozzy), I wanted more.

Much like Christopher Tolkien, it turns out Dee was keeping the wolves at bay.

[–] Seathru 3 points 11 months ago

Looking at what Ozzys put out in the last few years; I would have sworn his singing was already AI-generated. And Sharon's just puppeting him around à la Weekend at Bernies.