this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
262 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

45 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ca's c/main!

Since everyone on lemmy.ca gets subscribed here, this is the place to chat about the goings on at lemmy.ca, support-type items, suggestions, etc.

Announcements can be found at https://lemmy.ca/c/meta

For support related to this instance, use https://lemmy.ca/c/lemmy_ca_support

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
262
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Shadow@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca
 

Sorry (๐Ÿ) we did this without making a post, but after receiving several complaints we defederated from hexbear.net yesterday.

Here's a few quick examples of poor conduct by hexbear users:

They warned their users to behave themselves, but that didn't work: https://hexbear.net/post/280770?scrollToComments=false

Please read and respect the rules of the community instance in which you are posting/commenting. Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated. Realize that you are a representative of the hexbear instance when you post on other instances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] astral_avocado@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Man sounds like you should move if you hear people threatening violence regularly against all those groups at your local pub

ignoring the violence that landlords, yes even small ones, do

Are we actually talking about actual bodily harm or is this a new made up definition you just pulled out of your ass

[โ€“] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I'd argue that landlords of all types are backed by the violence of the state. That a lord or lady doesn't themselves toss you out and drag you off to jail isn't really a meaningful distinction to the person being forcibly removed from their home.

[โ€“] Firemyth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The funny part is that in one breathe you utter the fallacy to your own argument. Being forcibly removed from whose home again?

The one you paid the mortgage, down-payment, continuing maintenance, property taxes? Cause if that describes your home- guess what- you are a homeowner and cant be forced out of your home. If that's not describing the house you are living in... you are a tenant and market conditions dictate what the rent will be. Nobody is going to let to you at a loss.

So whatever reason you have for not being a homeowner means SOMEONE ELSE has to provide a home for you to live in. Which no one is going to just give you for free.

[โ€“] JennySmiles@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read up on the concepts of ownership, property, belongings, usage etc. you have a French/Roman tradition for millenia which discriminates those rights. That you are uneducated is hardly archomrade's fault.

You also ignore the monopoly of violence which is the state's and of course there is usage of violence even if you argue it is moral or can be legal. To think what legal is moral and what is legal is without violence would support genocides, colonialist murder of millions, their expropriation of land, goods, and children and legitimize atrocities of ultra nationalist governments.

The argument in short is: To ask yourself what you need to know to understand archomrade's points.

[โ€“] Firemyth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Omg. Pseudo-intellect is the worst intellect. The one thing you are right about- there is definitely no point arguing with you. I'd advise making something yourself and then trying to apply your principles when someone tells you what you can and can't do with it because they believe it's immoral.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)