this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

378 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Pak ‘n’ Save’s Savey Meal-bot cheerfully created unappealing recipes when customers experimented with non-grocery household items

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ransom@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

A spokesperson for the supermarket said they were disappointed to see “a small minority have tried to use the tool inappropriately and not for its intended purpose”

Disappointed. Bloody hell. A company that’s too cheap to curate some actual recipes is “disappointed” because the tech they built is creating lethal recipes. I wonder what their liability is if someone tried and got hurt/sick.

[–] jimbolauski@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Let's turn the outrage dial back a bit. People had the bot make recipies with non-grocery items for laughs ( ie bleach and ammonia) and unsurprisingly the bot combined them.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The fact that it's capable of doing so is obscenely dangerous and should draw serious legal attention.

[–] Ransom@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Corporations acting all parentally “disappointed” because they were too cheap to properly code it isn’t okay.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)