Hi! Any chance to have the Heat Lamp Theory posted over here? I think it would be real nice to have it here if possible, especially with new people coming in, & a less hostile environment.

[–] IntwadHelck@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Part of me liked the heat lamp theory, part of me didn’t. I prefer simpler. At a certain point, if 80% are in book and 20% are in plan, but cuz of loopholes 80% are reported as owned by the dtcc….that’s gonna get blown up/ won’t hold up. Part of it felt like a cointel situation, by putting in large grains of truth and then twisting it into this ultimate spin unnecessarily to actually hurt the book is better convo. Thoughts?

[–] 6days1week@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The most important part of what people call the Heat Lamp Theory is that DSPP shares are “shares enrolled in the plan” whereas what everyone assumed: that DSPP shares ONLY included plan shares. The difference between being “plan” and “in the plan” is significant because the former was 3 million shares (on the stockholder list) and the latter is 22 million+ shares (on the stockholder list). That is what I call the “DSPP revelations” but most people call the heat lamp theory. It’s important enough that I broke it into 2 chapters in the DD book. https://online.fliphtml5.com/lvrgy/kqab/#p=1

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)