Technology

37728 readers

66 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

227

Twitter traffic is 'tanking' as Meta's Threads hits 100 million users (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo to c/technology

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta's new text-based social app Threads has quickly gained 100 million users since launching last week, which appears to be negatively impacting traffic on Twitter. According to web analytics, Twitter traffic declined 5-11% over the first two days Threads was available compared to the previous week. Threads was able to grow rapidly by allowing users to sign up with their existing Instagram accounts and bring over some of their followers. However, Threads has not yet launched in Europe due to regulatory issues. The fast growth of Threads may solidify its position as a real competitor to Twitter, which has over 238 million daily active users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GuyDudeman 110 points 1 year ago (30 children)

This is a moment when I'd love to use the "you love to see it" meme comment, but it's more like... "People are fleeing the burning building, and running across the street to an identical building that is infested with rats and cockroaches!"

[–] sammydee@readit.buzz 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

While ranking the misdeeds of billionaires is a tricky business, given the choice I'd say Zuck is slightly better than Musk at the moment. :)

[–] svarozic@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

No need to limit yourself to those two awful options when good alternatives exist which aren't run by either of them.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (28 replies)