this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
18 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some reflections on the Australian experience and what they might mean for Canada.

After Google’s move on Thursday, Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez sent a written statement calling the companies’ moves “deeply irresponsible and out of touch … especially when they make billions of dollars off of Canadian users” with advertising.

Australia’s regulatory experiment – the first of its kind in the world – also got off to a rocky start, but it has since seen tech companies, news publishers and the government reach a middle ground.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

If the Canadian government were smart, they'd start a massive campaign to encourage Canadians to move to using RSS readers for all their news -- Google and Meta would lose their freaking minds, as it would let people read headlines and news summaries without even visiting their landing pages (less ad impressions) ... hit 'em where it hurts!

Edit: Clarifying my thinking ... maybe the Canadian government could propose to let Google et al. serve Canadian media outlet's stories through their search sites... but only if they committed to supporting RSS/Atom feeds of the same articles. This would force them to open up their data a bit and make alternatives to visiting their sites more viable.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There is no way the general public would adopt RSS. The barrier to entry is just too high right now. Technology that delivers news needs to be idiot-proof and require basically 1-2 steps

Eg:

  • click on the blue-green swirl
  • type "Facebook"

Or:

  • turn TV on
  • change channel to news

Don't get me wrong, RSS is great, but it's also used exclusively by the computer-literate and it has been that way for basically 25 years.

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

RSS does not necessarily mean clunky UI and difficult to use. There are some pretty beautiful podcast apps with great content discovery features out there :)

No reason a news app that reads RSS needs to be more complicated than opening Facebook.

“Pocket casts for blogs and written news” would be killer

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)